Bial | Patent Litigation Record

16 cases on record

Cases on record: 16
As claimant: 16
As respondent: 0
Patents held: Not recorded
Core tech: A61K31/55 · A61K31/19 · A61K45/06 · A61K9/20 · A61K9/26 · A61P25/00

Case no.	Parties	Role	Court	Filed	Duration	Outcome
1:22-cv-01270	Bial v. Aurobindo Pharma, Ltd.	Plaintiff	D. Del.	27 Sep 2022	48 d	Consent Judgment
1:20-cv-00780	Bial v. Hetero Labs Limited	Plaintiff	D. Del.	9 Jun 2020	50 d	Other
1:20-cv-00781	Bial v. Torrent Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.	Plaintiff	D. Del.	9 Jun 2020	527 d	Other
1:20-cv-00782	Bial v. Lupin Limited	Plaintiff	D. Del.	9 Jun 2020	203 d	Voluntary dismissal
1:20-cv-00783	Bial v. Jubilant Life Sciences Limited	Plaintiff	D. Del.	9 Jun 2020	633 d	Other
1:20-cv-00784	Bial v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd.	Plaintiff	D. Del.	9 Jun 2020	547 d	Voluntary dismissal
1:20-cv-00785	Bial v. Apotex, Inc.	Plaintiff	D. Del.	9 Jun 2020	695 d	Likely Settlement
1:19-cv-01673	Bial v. Torrent Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.	Plaintiff	D. Del.	6 Sep 2019	804 d	Other
1:18-cv-00775	Bial v. SPH Shanghai Zhongxi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.	Plaintiff	D. Del.	21 May 2018	737 d	Case Settled
1:18-cv-00382	Bial v. Apotex, Inc.	Plaintiff	D. Del.	9 Mar 2018	1518 d	Likely Settlement
1:18-cv-00341	Bial v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd.	Plaintiff	D. Del.	2 Mar 2018	1377 d	Voluntary dismissal
1:18-cv-00342	Bial v. Hetero Labs Limited	Plaintiff	D. Del.	2 Mar 2018	880 d	Other
3:18-cv-03098	Bial v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd.	Plaintiff	D.N.J.	2 Mar 2018	63 d	Voluntary dismissal
1:18-cv-00336	Bial v. Jubilant Life Sciences Limited	Plaintiff	D. Del.	1 Mar 2018	1464 d	Other
1:18-cv-00312	Bial v. Lupin Limited	Plaintiff	D. Del.	23 Feb 2018	1040 d	Voluntary dismissal
1:18-cv-00279	Bial v. Torrent Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.	Plaintiff	D. Del.	16 Feb 2018	1371 d	Other

Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Bial in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Bial Patent litigation record

16 cases on record

See what Bial is protecting