BMC Software, Inc. Patent litigation record

Company 19 cases

19 cases on record naming BMC Software, Inc.: 6 as claimant, 13 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

19 cases on record

Cases on record
19
As claimant
6
As respondent
13
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
G06F9/46 · G06F9/50
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
4:23-cv-03837 FrameTech, LLC v. BMC Software, Inc. Defendant S.D. Tex. 11 Oct 2023 719 d Dismissed with Prejudice
6:23-cv-00494 FrameTech, LLC v. BMC Software, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 13 Jul 2023 90 d Case Transferred
6:23-cv-00165 Focus Global Solutions, LLC v. BMC Software, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 6 Mar 2023 24 d Voluntary dismissal
1:21-cv-01086 Comserve Solutions, LLC v. BMC Software, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 1 Dec 2021 91 d Voluntary dismissal
6:21-cv-00911 Callstat Solutions, LLC v. BMC Software, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 2 Sep 2021 104 d Voluntary dismissal
6:20-cv-00787 BCS Software, LLC v. BMC Software, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 27 Aug 2020 193 d Voluntary dismissal
1:17-cv-03127 BMC Software, Inc. v. Cherwell Software, LLC Plaintiff D. Colo. 22 Dec 2017 220 d Stayed
1:17-cv-01074 BMC Software, Inc. v. Cherwell Software, LLC Plaintiff E.D. Va. 22 Sep 2017 90 d Case Transferred
1:17-cv-01399 Cherwell Software, LLC v. BMC Software, Inc. Defendant D. Colo. 8 Jun 2017 97 d Voluntary dismissal
3:17-cv-01369 BMC Software, Inc. v. Cherwell Software, LLC Plaintiff N.D. Tex. 22 May 2017 465 d Likely Settlement
2:17-cv-00374 BMC Software, Inc. v. Cherwell Software, LLC Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 28 Apr 2017 158 d Procedural Outcome
2:16-cv-01251 Mozly Tech, LLC v. BMC Software, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 9 Nov 2016 126 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-00132 BMC Software, Inc. v. ServiceNow, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 12 Feb 2016 62 d Voluntary dismissal
1:15-cv-00639 Kaavo, Inc. v. BMC Software, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 24 Jul 2015 607 d Likely Settlement
6:15-cv-01012 zIT Consulting GmbH v. BMC Software, Inc. Defendant M.D. Fla. 19 Jun 2015 661 d Stayed
6:15-cv-00464 RealTime Data, LLC v. BMC Software, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 8 May 2015 150 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-00530 Dashboard Computing, LLC v. BMC Software, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 21 Apr 2015 106 d Likely Settlement
2:14-cv-00903 BMC Software, Inc. v. ServiceNow, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 23 Sep 2014 580 d Likely Settlement
1:14-cv-01191 Kaavo, Inc. v. Bmc Software, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 15 Sep 2014 919 d Likely Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming BMC Software, Inc. in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what BMC Software is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.