Box, Inc. Patent litigation record

Company 31 cases

31 cases on record naming Box, Inc.: 0 as claimant, 31 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

31 cases on record

Cases on record
31
As claimant
0
As respondent
31
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
Not recorded
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
7:25-cv-00338 WebSock Global Strategies, LLC v. Box, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 4 Aug 2025 2 d Voluntary dismissal
7:25-cv-00212 DigiMedia Tech, LLC v. Box, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 6 May 2025 69 d Dismissed with Prejudice
7:25-cv-00196 Calibrate Networks LLC v. Box, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 24 Apr 2025 47 d Voluntary dismissal
24-2218 Topia Technology, Inc. v. Box, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 14 Aug 2024 574 d Unpatentable
24-2219 Topia Technology, Inc. v. Box, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 14 Aug 2024 574 d Unpatentable
6:24-cv-00072 Secure Ink LLC v. Box, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 2 Feb 2024 52 d Dismissed with Prejudice
6:24-cv-00060 TG--2006 Holdings, LLC v. Box, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 31 Jan 2024 6 d Voluntary dismissal
6:22-cv-00523 Digital Verification Systems, LLC v. Box, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 23 May 2022 4 d Voluntary dismissal
6:21-cv-01372 Topia Technology, Inc. v. Box, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 29 Dec 2021 370 d Case Transferred
6:20-cv-00898 Paradise IP, LLC v. Box, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 30 Sep 2020 149 d Voluntary dismissal
1:20-cv-00763 DataCloud Technologies, LLC v. Box, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 5 Jun 2020 440 d Voluntary dismissal
4:19-cv-06988 Uniloc 2017, LLC v. Box, Inc. Defendant N.D. Cal. 24 Oct 2019 106 d Judgment on the Merits
1:19-cv-00594 Uniloc 2017, LLC v. Box, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 10 Jun 2019 127 d Case Transferred
6:19-cv-00315 Data Scape Limited v. Box, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 21 May 2019 108 d Voluntary dismissal
6:19-cv-00025 Data Scape, Ltd. v. Box, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 25 Jan 2019 152 d Voluntary dismissal
3:18-cv-07038 Uniloc 2017, LLC v. Box, Inc. Defendant N.D. Cal. 20 Nov 2018 154 d Voluntary dismissal
3:18-cv-03432 Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Box, Inc. Defendant N.D. Cal. 8 Jun 2018 202 d Voluntary dismissal
1:17-cv-00754 Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Box, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 11 Aug 2017 299 d Case Transferred
1:17-cv-00755 Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Box, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 11 Aug 2017 68 d Likely Settlement
2:17-cv-00173 Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Box, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 6 Mar 2017 163 d Other
2:16-cv-01385 Micoba, LLC v. Box, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 9 Dec 2016 122 d Voluntary dismissal
2:15-cv-01647 St. Luke Technologies, LLC v. Box, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 8 Oct 2015 113 d Likely Settlement
2015-2052 Open Text, S.A. v. Box, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 22 Sep 2015 195 d Closed
2015-1978 Open Text, S.A. v. Box, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 4 Sep 2015 213 d Closed
3:15-cv-03063 Hall Data Sync Technologies, LLC v. Box, Inc. Defendant N.D. Cal. 1 Jul 2015 77 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-00594 Elia Data of Texas, LLC v. Box, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 1 May 2015 182 d Likely Settlement
2015-1392 Open Text, S.A. v. Box, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 27 Feb 2015 402 d Closed
1:15-cv-00091 Fo2go, LLC v. Box, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 27 Jan 2015 269 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-00002 Hall Data Sync Technologies, LLC v. Box, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 5 Jan 2015 183 d Case Transferred
2:14-cv-00986 Vantage Point Technology, Inc. v. Box, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 21 Oct 2014 153 d Likely Settlement
3:13-cv-04910 Open Text, S.A. v. Box, Inc. Defendant N.D. Cal. 24 Oct 2013 477 d Likely Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Box, Inc. in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Box is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.