CDR Printing, LLC Patent litigation record

Company 18 cases

18 cases on record naming CDR Printing, LLC: 18 as claimant, 0 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

18 cases on record

Cases on record
18
As claimant
18
As respondent
0
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
Not recorded
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
2:16-cv-01043 CDR Printing, LLC v. Spec's Family Partners, Ltd. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 22 Sep 2016 321 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-01044 CDR Printing, LLC v. Allsup's Convenience Stores, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 22 Sep 2016 271 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-00029 CDR Printing, LLC v. Aldi, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 8 Jan 2016 283 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-00030 CDR Printing, LLC v. The Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 8 Jan 2016 110 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-01566 CDR Printing, LLC v. Bank of America Corporation Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 2 Oct 2015 88 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-01567 CDR Printing, LLC v. Wells Fargo & Company Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 2 Oct 2015 96 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-01568 CDR Printing, LLC v. BestBuy.com, LLC Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 2 Oct 2015 88 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-01569 CDR Printing, LLC v. DSW, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 2 Oct 2015 80 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-01279 CDR Printing, LLC v. Target Corporation Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 16 Jul 2015 125 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-01280 CDR Printing, LLC v. Barnes & Noble Booksellers, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 16 Jul 2015 166 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-01281 CDR Printing, LLC v. Time Warner Cable, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 16 Jul 2015 112 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-01282 CDR Printing, LLC v. Starbucks Corporation Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 16 Jul 2015 166 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-00451 CDR Printing, LLC v. Office Depot, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 2 Apr 2015 285 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-00452 CDR Printing, LLC v. Walgreen, Co. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 2 Apr 2015 228 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-00453 CDR Printing, LLC v. Staples, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 2 Apr 2015 281 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-00454 CDR Printing, LLC v. Hewlett-Packard Company Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 2 Apr 2015 161 d Likely Settlement
2:14-cv-00801 CDR Printing, LLC v. Fedex Office and Print Services, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 29 Jul 2014 328 d Likely Settlement
2:14-cv-00802 CDR Printing, LLC v. Canon U.S.A., Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 29 Jul 2014 286 d Likely Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming CDR Printing, LLC in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what CDR Printing is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.