CheckWizard LLC Patent litigation record

Company 19 cases

19 cases on record naming CheckWizard LLC: 19 as claimant, 0 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

19 cases on record

Cases on record
19
As claimant
19
As respondent
0
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
G06K9/00 · G06T3/40 · H04N7/14
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
2:26-cv-00278 CheckWizard LLC v. First National of Nebraska, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 6 Apr 2026 128 d Dismissed with Prejudice
2:26-cv-00279 CheckWizard LLC v. Hancock Whitney Corp. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 6 Apr 2026 65 d Voluntary dismissal
2:26-cv-00280 CheckWizard LLC v. Planters Holding Company, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 6 Apr 2026 44 d Dismissed without Prejudice
2:26-cv-00281 CheckWizard LLC v. Simmons First National Corporation Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 6 Apr 2026 44 d Voluntary dismissal
3:25-cv-03195 CheckWizard LLC v. Ally Financial, Inc. Plaintiff N.D. Tex. 20 Nov 2025 29 d Dismissed with Prejudice
3:25-cv-03196 CheckWizard LLC v. BankUnited Inc Plaintiff N.D. Tex. 20 Nov 2025 5 d Dismissed with Prejudice
4:25-cv-01314 CheckWizard LLC v. First Financial Bank, National Association Plaintiff N.D. Tex. 20 Nov 2025 22 d Voluntary dismissal
7:25-cv-00513 CheckWizard LLC v. United Service Automobile Association Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 5 Nov 2025 85 d Closed
7:25-cv-00514 CheckWizard LLC v. Northern Trust Corp. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 5 Nov 2025 250 d Voluntary dismissal
2:25-cv-00826 CheckWizard LLC v. American National Bank of Texas Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 21 Aug 2025 8 d Voluntary dismissal
2:25-cv-00828 CheckWizard LLC v. Bokf, Na. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 21 Aug 2025 55 d Voluntary dismissal
2:25-cv-00829 CheckWizard LLC v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 21 Aug 2025 6 d Voluntary dismissal
2:25-cv-00146 CheckWizard v. Bank of America Corp. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 6 Feb 2025 50 d Voluntary dismissal
2:25-cv-00148 CheckWizard v. H & R Block, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 6 Feb 2025 82 d Voluntary dismissal
2:25-cv-00149 CheckWizard v. Independent Bank Group, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 6 Feb 2025 105 d Dismissed with Prejudice
2:25-cv-00150 CheckWizard v. Plains Capital Bank Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 6 Feb 2025 182 d Dismissed with Prejudice
2:25-cv-00151 CheckWizard v. Regions Financial Corporation Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 6 Feb 2025 34 d Dismissed with Prejudice
2:25-cv-00152 CheckWizard v. Washington Federal Bank, National Association Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 6 Feb 2025 79 d Voluntary dismissal
2:25-cv-00153 CheckWizard v. WoodForest Financial Group, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 6 Feb 2025 105 d Voluntary dismissal
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming CheckWizard LLC in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what CheckWizard is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.