Cochlear Corporation | Patent Litigation Record

10 cases on record

Cases on record: 10
As claimant: 4
As respondent: 6
Patents held: Not recorded
Core tech: A61B17/00 · A61C8/00 · A61B17/86 · H04R25/00 · A61N1/375 · A61N1/08 · A61N1/378 · A61N1/37 · H04H7/00 · A61B17/56

Case no.	Parties	Role	Court	Filed	Duration	Outcome
2021-1448	Oticon Medical LLC v. Cochlear Limited	Defendant	Fed. Cir.	22 Dec 2020	49 d	Closed
20-362	Cochlear Corporation v. Alfred E. Mann Foundation For Scientific Research	Plaintiff	U.S. Supreme Court	17 Sep 2020	88 d	Appeal Denied
1:19-cv-10303	Cochlear, Ltd. v. MED-EL Corporation	Plaintiff	D. Mass.	18 Feb 2019	147 d	Procedural Outcome
2019-1201	Alfred E. Mann Foundation For Scientific Research v. Cochlear Corporation	Defendant	Fed. Cir.	14 Nov 2018	488 d	Closed
1:17-cv-00660	Cochlear, Ltd. v. Oticon Medical, AB	Plaintiff	D. Colo.	13 Mar 2017	282 d	Likely Settlement
1:16-cv-01700	Cochlear, Ltd. v. Oticon Medical, AB	Plaintiff	D. Colo.	1 Jul 2016	451 d	Stayed
2015-1606	Alfred E. Mann Foundation For Scientific Research v. Cochlear Corporation	Defendant	Fed. Cir.	30 Apr 2015	567 d	Closed
2015-1607	Alfred E. Mann Foundation For Scientific Research v. Cochlear Corporation	Defendant	Fed. Cir.	30 Apr 2015	567 d	Closed
2015-1580	Alfred E. Mann Foundation For Scientific Research v. Cochlear Corporation	Defendant	Fed. Cir.	22 Apr 2015	575 d	Closed
2:07-cv-08108	Alfred E. Mann Foundation For Scientific Research v. Cochlear Corporation	Defendant	C.D. Cal.	13 Dec 2007	3984 d	Judgment on the Merits

Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Cochlear Corporation in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Cochlear Corporation Patent litigation record

10 cases on record

See what Cochlear is protecting