Codec Technologies, LLC Patent litigation record

Company 35 cases

35 cases on record naming Codec Technologies, LLC: 35 as claimant, 0 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

35 cases on record

Cases on record
35
As claimant
35
As respondent
0
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
G06T9/00 · H03M7/30 · H03M7/40 · H04N7/50
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
5:18-cv-00016 Codec Technologies, LLC v. Mattel, Inc. Plaintiff S.D. Tex. 5 Feb 2018 72 d Voluntary dismissal
6:18-cv-00053 Codec Technologies, LLC v. Cinemark USA, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 5 Feb 2018 86 d Voluntary dismissal
6:18-cv-00054 Codec Technologies, LLC v. Texas Instruments, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 5 Feb 2018 116 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-01426 Codec Technologies, LLC v. Craig Electronics, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 20 Dec 2016 105 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-01427 Codec Technologies, LLC v. Pivos Technology Group, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 20 Dec 2016 120 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-01428 Codec Technologies, LLC v. Naxa Electronics, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 20 Dec 2016 55 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-01429 Codec Technologies, LLC v. RSPA, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 20 Dec 2016 409 d Voluntary dismissal
2:16-cv-01430 Codec Technologies, LLC v. VOXX Electronics, Corp. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 20 Dec 2016 470 d Voluntary dismissal
2:16-cv-01431 Codec Technologies, LLC v. Vulcan Electronics, Corp. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 20 Dec 2016 83 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-01432 Codec Technologies, LLC v. Global Phoenix Computer Technologies Solutions, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 20 Dec 2016 50 d Voluntary dismissal
2:16-cv-01435 Codec Technologies, LLC v. PLR IP Holdings, LLC Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 20 Dec 2016 100 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-01436 Codec Technologies, LLC v. Curtis International, Ltd. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 20 Dec 2016 84 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-01437 Codec Technologies, LLC v. Datawind, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 20 Dec 2016 134 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-00878 Codec Technologies, LLC v. Lenovo (United States), Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 9 Aug 2016 97 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-00879 Codec Technologies, LLC v. Double Power Technology, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 9 Aug 2016 132 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-00880 Codec Technologies, LLC v. Skytex Technology, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 9 Aug 2016 129 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-00882 Codec Technologies, LLC v. Chenzhi Corporation Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 9 Aug 2016 132 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-00883 Codec Technologies, LLC v. ANTM USA Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 9 Aug 2016 129 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-00884 Codec Technologies, LLC v. Talent Grant Tech, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 9 Aug 2016 29 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-00885 Codec Technologies, LLC v. LeapFrog Enterprises, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 9 Aug 2016 3 d Voluntary dismissal
2:16-cv-00886 Codec Technologies, LLC v. Supersonic, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 9 Aug 2016 29 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-00887 Codec Technologies, LLC v. Hipstreet Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 9 Aug 2016 129 d Voluntary dismissal
2:16-cv-00888 Codec Technologies, LLC v. Ugoos Industrial Co., Ltd. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 9 Aug 2016 129 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-00303 Codec Technologies, LLC v. Azpen Innovation, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 30 Mar 2016 79 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-00304 Codec Technologies, LLC v. Kyocera Communications, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 30 Mar 2016 97 d Other
2:16-cv-00305 Codec Technologies, LLC v. Blu Products, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 30 Mar 2016 92 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-00306 Codec Technologies, LLC v. Pantech Wireless, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 30 Mar 2016 225 d Voluntary dismissal
2:16-cv-00307 Codec Technologies, LLC v. Coolpad Technologies, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 30 Mar 2016 104 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-00308 Codec Technologies, LLC v. Asus Computer International, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 30 Mar 2016 124 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-00310 Codec Technologies, LLC v. Shagal Limited Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 30 Mar 2016 127 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-00311 Codec Technologies, LLC v. Best Buy Purchasing, LLC Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 30 Mar 2016 113 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-00312 Codec Technologies, LLC v. Acer America Corporation Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 30 Mar 2016 225 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-00313 Codec Technologies, LLC v. HTC America, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 30 Mar 2016 113 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-00314 Codec Technologies, LLC v. Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 30 Mar 2016 433 d Procedural Outcome
2:16-cv-00315 Codec Technologies, LLC v. Visual Land, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 30 Mar 2016 92 d Likely Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Codec Technologies, LLC in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Codec Technologies is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.