CommScope Holding Co, Inc. Patent litigation record

Company 25 cases

25 cases on record naming CommScope Holding Co, Inc.: 6 as claimant, 19 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

25 cases on record

Cases on record
25
As claimant
6
As respondent
19
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
H04W56/00 · H04W88/08
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
26-1285 Commscope, Inc. v. Belden Canada Ulc Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 23 Dec 2025 188 d Voluntary dismissal
26-1255 Belden Canada Ulc v. Commscope, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 15 Dec 2025 196 d Voluntary dismissal
2:25-cv-00342 CommPlex Systems LLC v. CommScope Holding Company, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 7 Apr 2025 64 d Voluntary dismissal
25-1440 Belden Technologies, Inc. v. CommScope Holding Co, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 13 Feb 2025 41 d Voluntary dismissal
25-1441 Belden Technologies, Inc. v. CommScope Holding Co, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 13 Feb 2025 41 d Voluntary dismissal
25-1428 CommScope Holding Co, Inc. v. Belden Technologies, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 10 Feb 2025 501 d Voluntary dismissal
1:24-cv-00411 CommScope Holding Co, Inc. v. Belden Technologies, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 1 Apr 2024 816 d Dismissed with Prejudice
24-1587 TQ Delta, LLC v. CommScope Holding Company, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 21 Mar 2024 764 d Appeal Dismissed
24-1588 CommScope Holding Company, Inc. v. TQ Delta, LLC Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 21 Mar 2024 764 d Appeal Dismissed
2:23-cv-00510 CommWorks Solutions, LLC v. CommScope Holding Company, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 3 Nov 2023 203 d Dismissed with Prejudice
2:23-cv-00455 Cobblestone Wireless, LLC v. Commscope Holding Company, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 29 Sep 2023 915 d Case Dismissed
1:23-cv-00810 Belden Canada ULC v. Commscope, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 27 Jul 2023 405 d Case Dismissed
1:23-cv-02416 Fi.Mo.Tec. SPA v. CommScope Holding Co, Inc. Defendant N.D. Ga. 30 May 2023 202 d Dismissed with Prejudice
2:22-cv-00332 Arena IP, LLC v. Commscope, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 25 Aug 2022 175 d Consent Judgment
1:22-cv-00782 Belden Canada ULC v. Commscope, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 13 Jun 2022 1219 d Dismissed without Prejudice
1:22-cv-00783 Belden Technologies, Inc. v. Commscope, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 13 Jun 2022 630 d Case Stayed
1:22-cv-00737 Belden Inc. v. CommScope, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 6 Jun 2022 2 d Voluntary dismissal
22-1699 Dali Wireless, Inc. v. CommScope Holding Co, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 20 Apr 2022 546 d Appeal Dismissed
6:21-cv-00941 Bell Northern Research, LLC v. CommScope Holding Company, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 10 Sep 2021 138 d Voluntary dismissal
1:21-cv-00377 CommScope Holding Co, Inc. v. AFL Telecommunications LLC Plaintiff D. Del. 15 Mar 2021 1320 d Voluntary dismissal
1:21-cv-00305 PPC Broadband, Inc. v. CommScope, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 26 Feb 2021 370 d Voluntary dismissal
5:20-cv-00168 Sipco, LLC v. CommScope Holding Company, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 3 Nov 2020 311 d Voluntary dismissal
1:20-cv-01263 Q3 Networking, LLC v. CommScope Holding Company, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 21 Sep 2020 1423 d Dismissed without Prejudice
20-1045 Dali Wireless, Inc. v. CommScope Holding Co, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 16 Oct 2019 1421 d Appeal Dismissed
1:15-cv-00837 CommScope, Inc. v. Corning Optical Communications Wireless, Ltd. Plaintiff D. Del. 18 Sep 2015 96 d Likely Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming CommScope Holding Co, Inc. in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Commscope is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.