ConforMIS, Inc. | Patent Litigation Record

14 cases on record

Cases on record: 14
As claimant: 10
As respondent: 4
Patents held: Not recorded
Core tech: A61F2/38 · A61F2/30 · A61F2/36 · A61F2/40 · A61B17/17 · A61B17/15 · A61F2/08 · A61B17/56 · A61L27/00 · A61B17/00 · B23P17/04 · A61F2/46 · B23Q17/00 · A61F5/00 · A61B17/90 · A61B5/107

Case no.	Parties	Role	Court	Filed	Duration	Outcome
8:21-cv-01346	Conformis, Inc. v. Bodycad Laboratories, Inc.	Plaintiff	M.D. Fla.	3 Jun 2021	533 d	Consent Judgment
1:20-cv-00562	ConforMIS, Inc. v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc.	Plaintiff	D. Del.	24 Apr 2020	439 d	Voluntary dismissal
1:20-cv-00405	Osteoplastics, LLC v. Conformis, Inc.	Defendant	D. Del.	20 Mar 2020	1190 d	Dismissed with Prejudice
1:19-cv-02093	Zimmer US, Inc. v. ConforMIS, Inc.	Defendant	D. Del.	5 Nov 2019	206 d	Voluntary dismissal
1:19-cv-01618	Conformis, Inc. v. Medacta USA, Inc.	Plaintiff	D. Del.	29 Aug 2019	1204 d	Case Terminated
2018-2255	ConforMIS, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.	Plaintiff	Fed. Cir.	16 Aug 2018	102 d	Closed
2018-2257	ConforMIS, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.	Plaintiff	Fed. Cir.	16 Aug 2018	102 d	Closed
2018-2258	ConforMIS, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.	Plaintiff	Fed. Cir.	16 Aug 2018	102 d	Closed
2018-2054	Conformis, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.	Plaintiff	Fed. Cir.	8 Jun 2018	459 d	Closed
2018-2027	ConforMIS, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.	Plaintiff	Fed. Cir.	31 May 2018	467 d	Closed
1:16-cv-10420	ConforMIS, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.	Plaintiff	D. Mass.	29 Feb 2016	939 d	Likely Settlement
1:15-cv-00950	Orthopedic Innovations, Inc. v. ConforMIS, Inc.	Defendant	D. Del.	21 Oct 2015	162 d	Voluntary dismissal
1:13-cv-12312	ConforMIS, Inc. v. Wright Medical Group, Inc.	Plaintiff	D. Mass.	19 Sep 2013	573 d	Likely Settlement
1:12-cv-01109	Bonutti Skeletal Innovations, LLC v. ConforMIS, Inc.	Defendant	D. Del.	10 Sep 2012	878 d	Likely Settlement

Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming ConforMIS, Inc. in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

ConforMIS, Inc. Patent litigation record

14 cases on record

See what Conformis is protecting