CoolTVNetwork.com, Inc. Patent litigation record

Company 27 cases

27 cases on record naming CoolTVNetwork.com, Inc.: 27 as claimant, 0 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

27 cases on record

Cases on record
27
As claimant
27
As respondent
0
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
G06F3/00 · G06F17/00 · G06F9/00 · G06Q30/02
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
24-2030 CoolTVNetwork.com, Inc. v. Blackboard, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 2 Jul 2024 295 d Appeal Dismissed
24-2031 CoolTVNetwork.com, Inc. v. Facebook, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 2 Jul 2024 295 d Appeal Dismissed
24-2032 CoolTVNetwork.com, Inc. v. International Business Machines, Corp. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 2 Jul 2024 295 d Appeal Dismissed
24-2033 CoolTVNetwork.com, Inc. v. Kaltura, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 2 Jul 2024 295 d Unpatentable
24-2034 CoolTVNetwork.com, Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 2 Jul 2024 476 d Appeal Dismissed
24-2035 CoolTVNetwork.com, Inc. v. Microsoft, Co. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 2 Jul 2024 295 d Unpatentable
24-2036 CoolTVNetwork.com, Inc. v. Ooyala, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 2 Jul 2024 295 d Appeal Dismissed
24-2037 CoolTVNetwork.com, Inc. v. Snap, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 2 Jul 2024 295 d Appeal Dismissed
24-2038 CoolTVNetwork.com, Inc. v. Trapelo, Corp. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 2 Jul 2024 295 d Unpatentable
2021-2191 CoolTVNetwork.com, Inc. v. Blackboard, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 3 Aug 2021 338 d Closed
2021-2192 CoolTVNetwork.com, Inc. v. Facebook, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 3 Aug 2021 338 d Closed
2021-2193 CoolTVNetwork.com, Inc. v. International Business Machines Corporation Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 3 Aug 2021 338 d Closed
2021-2195 CoolTVNetwork.com, Inc. v. Kaltura, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 3 Aug 2021 338 d Closed
2021-2196 CoolTVNetwork.com, Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 3 Aug 2021 338 d Closed
2021-2197 CoolTVNetwork.com, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 3 Aug 2021 338 d Closed
2021-2198 CoolTVNetwork.com, Inc. v. Ooyala, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 3 Aug 2021 338 d Closed
2021-2199 CoolTVNetwork.com, Inc. v. Snap, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 3 Aug 2021 338 d Closed
2021-2200 CoolTVNetwork.com, Inc. v. Trapelo, Corp. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 3 Aug 2021 338 d Closed
1:19-cv-00534 CoolTVNetwork.com, Inc. v. Snap, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 19 Mar 2019 850 d Judgment on the Merits
1:19-cv-00535 CoolTVNetwork.com, Inc. v. Trapelo, Corp. Plaintiff D. Del. 19 Mar 2019 850 d Judgment on the Merits
1:19-cv-00291 CoolTVNetwork.com, Inc. v. Blackboard, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 11 Feb 2019 886 d Judgment on the Merits
1:19-cv-00292 CoolTVNetwork.com, Inc. v. Facebook, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 11 Feb 2019 886 d Judgment on the Merits
1:19-cv-00293 CoolTVNetwork.com, Inc. v. International Business Machines Corporation Plaintiff D. Del. 11 Feb 2019 886 d Judgment on the Merits
1:19-cv-00294 CoolTVNetwork.com, Inc. v. Kaltura, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 11 Feb 2019 886 d Judgment on the Merits
1:19-cv-00295 CoolTVNetwork.com, Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 11 Feb 2019 886 d Judgment on the Merits
1:19-cv-00296 CoolTVNetwork.com, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation Plaintiff D. Del. 11 Feb 2019 886 d Judgment on the Merits
1:19-cv-00297 CoolTVNetwork.com, Inc. v. Ooyala, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 11 Feb 2019 886 d Judgment on the Merits
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming CoolTVNetwork.com, Inc. in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what CoolTVNetwork.com is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.