Corning, Inc. | Patent Litigation Record

12 cases on record

Cases on record: 12
As claimant: 4
As respondent: 8
Patents held: Not recorded
Core tech: C03B5/225 · C03B17/00 · C03C3/091 · C03C3/076 · G02B6/00 · G02B6/38 · G02B6/44

Case no.	Parties	Role	Court	Filed	Duration	Outcome
337-TA-1441	Corning, Inc. v. Caihong Display Devices Co., Ltd., d/b/a Irico Display Devices Co., Ltd.	Plaintiff	United States International Trade Commission	31 Jan 2025	552 d	Case Settled
23-1610	Dali Wireless, Inc. v. Corning, Inc.	Defendant	Fed. Cir.	17 Mar 2023	123 d	Appeal Dismissed
6:22-cv-01314	Dali Wireless, Inc. v. Corning, Inc.	Defendant	W.D. Tex.	27 Dec 2022	378 d	Dismissed with Prejudice
6:22-cv-06404	Harmony Licensing, LLC v. Corning, Inc.	Defendant	W.D.N.Y.	22 Sep 2022	140 d	Voluntary dismissal
337-TA-1194	Corning, Inc. v. Panduit, Corp.	Plaintiff	United States International Trade Commission	26 Nov 2021	348 d	Case Settled
6:21-cv-06608	Stormborn Technologies, LLC v. Corning Incorporated	Defendant	W.D.N.Y.	29 Sep 2021	77 d	Voluntary dismissal
1:21-cv-01185	Corning, Inc. v. Leviton Manufacturing Co., Inc.	Plaintiff	D. Del.	18 Aug 2021	1722 d	Dismissed with Prejudice
3:20-cv-06469	Dali Wireless, Inc. v. Corning, Inc.	Defendant	N.D. Cal.	16 Sep 2020	798 d	Judgment on the merits for Defendant
6:20-cv-00827	Dali Wireless, Inc. v. Corning, Inc.	Defendant	W.D. Tex.	9 Sep 2020	132 d	Voluntary dismissal
5:18-cv-00229	Panduit, Corp. v. Corning Incorporated	Defendant	E.D.N.C.	23 May 2018	1267 d	Judgment on the Merits
1:14-cv-08111	DSM Desotech, Inc. v. Corning Incorporated	Defendant	N.D. Ill.	16 Oct 2014	440 d	Likely Settlement
1:14-cv-01081	Corning, Inc. v. DSM Desotech, Inc.	Plaintiff	D. Del.	21 Aug 2014	502 d	Likely Settlement

Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Corning, Inc. in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Corning, Inc. Patent litigation record

12 cases on record

See what Corning is protecting