CXT Systems, Inc. Patent litigation record

Company 18 cases

18 cases on record naming CXT Systems, Inc.: 17 as claimant, 1 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

18 cases on record

Cases on record
18
As claimant
17
As respondent
1
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
G06F17/30 · G06Q40/00 · G06Q10/00 · G06Q10/10 · G06Q30/00
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
2:21-cv-00259 HCL Technologies Limited v. CXT Systems, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 13 Jul 2021 126 d Case Dismissed
2:21-cv-00092 CXT Systems, Inc. v. The Sherwin-Williams Company Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 17 Mar 2021 273 d Voluntary dismissal
2:21-cv-00094 CXT Systems, Inc. v. Advance auto parts, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 17 Mar 2021 272 d Voluntary dismissal
2:21-cv-00095 CXT Systems, Inc. v. Costco Wholesale Corporation Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 17 Mar 2021 273 d Voluntary dismissal
2:21-cv-00096 CXT Systems, Inc. v. IKEA North America Services, LLC Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 17 Mar 2021 272 d Voluntary dismissal
2:21-cv-00097 CXT Systems, Inc. v. V.F. Corporation Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 17 Mar 2021 272 d Voluntary dismissal
2:19-cv-00272 CXT Systems, Inc. v. Steven Madden, Ltd. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 8 Aug 2019 275 d Voluntary dismissal
2:19-cv-00167 CXT Systems, Inc. v. Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 10 May 2019 326 d Other
2:19-cv-00169 CXT Systems, Inc. v. Retail Concepts, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 10 May 2019 270 d Voluntary dismissal
2:19-cv-00170 CXT Systems, Inc. v. C.C. Filson, Co. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 10 May 2019 326 d Voluntary dismissal
2:18-cv-00231 CXT Systems, Inc. v. Conn's, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 24 May 2018 610 d Voluntary dismissal
2:18-cv-00232 CXT Systems, Inc. v. Fossil Group, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 24 May 2018 691 d Voluntary dismissal
2:18-cv-00233 CXT Systems, Inc. v. J. C. Penney Company, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 24 May 2018 97 d Voluntary dismissal
2:18-cv-00234 CXT Systems, Inc. v. Stage Stores, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 24 May 2018 566 d Voluntary dismissal
2:18-cv-00235 CXT Systems, Inc. v. Tailored Brands, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 24 May 2018 756 d Likely Settlement
2:18-cv-00171 CXT Systems, Inc. v. Academy, Ltd. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 27 Apr 2018 847 d Voluntary dismissal
2:18-cv-00172 CXT Systems, Inc. v. Pier 1 Imports, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 27 Apr 2018 552 d Voluntary dismissal
2:18-cv-00173 CXT Systems, Inc. v. The Container Store Group, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 27 Apr 2018 461 d Likely Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming CXT Systems, Inc. in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what CXT Systems is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.