Dataquill Limited | Patent Litigation Record

11 cases on record

Cases on record: 11
As claimant: 11
As respondent: 0
Patents held: Not recorded
Core tech: G06K7/10 · G06K17/00 · G06F3/06 · G06K7/00 · H04M1/00

Case no.	Parties	Role	Court	Filed	Duration	Outcome
1:22-cv-00610	Dataquill, Ltd. v. Amazon.com, Inc.	Plaintiff	D. Del.	6 May 2022	377 d	Consent Judgment
1:21-cv-01438	Dataquill, Ltd. v. Google, LLC	Plaintiff	D. Del.	8 Oct 2021	396 d	Consent Judgment
1:21-cv-00883	Dataquill Limited v. T-Mobile US, Inc.	Plaintiff	D. Del.	21 Jun 2021	133 d	Voluntary dismissal
1:21-cv-22275	DataQuill Limited v. Simply, Inc.	Plaintiff	S.D. Fla.	21 Jun 2021	113 d	Voluntary dismissal
1:20-cv-20760	Dataquill Limited v. Blu Products, Inc.	Plaintiff	S.D. Fla.	21 Feb 2020	270 d	Stayed
6:20-cv-00017	Dataquill Limited v. Acer America Corporation	Plaintiff	W.D. Tex.	10 Jan 2020	97 d	Voluntary dismissal
2:19-cv-00280	Dataquill Limited v. Asustek Computer, Inc.	Plaintiff	E.D. Tex.	14 Aug 2019	317 d	Voluntary dismissal
2:19-cv-00281	Dataquill Limited v. Coolpad Technologies, Inc.	Plaintiff	E.D. Tex.	14 Aug 2019	216 d	Voluntary dismissal
2:19-cv-03394	Dataquill Limited v. TCL Communication Technology Holdings Limited	Plaintiff	C.D. Cal.	26 Apr 2019	753 d	Voluntary dismissal
2:13-cv-00633	Dataquill Limited v. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.	Plaintiff	E.D. Tex.	16 Aug 2013	887 d	Likely Settlement
2:13-cv-00634	Dataquill Limited v. ZTE Corporation	Plaintiff	E.D. Tex.	16 Aug 2013	887 d	Likely Settlement

Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Dataquill Limited in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Dataquill Limited Patent litigation record

11 cases on record

See what Dataquill is protecting