DexCom, Inc. Patent litigation record

Company 32 cases

32 cases on record naming DexCom, Inc.: 20 as claimant, 12 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

32 cases on record

Cases on record
32
As claimant
20
As respondent
12
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
A61B5/1468 · A61B5/1486 · A61B5/1495 · A61B5/1473 · A61B5/00 · A61B5/145 · A61B5/05 · C12Q1/00 · G01N27/327 · G01N · G01N27/26
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
25-1303 Abbott Laboratories, Inc. v. DexCom, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 19 Dec 2024 7 d Voluntary dismissal
25-1230 DexCom, Inc. v. Abbott Diabetes Care Ltd. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 2 Dec 2024 24 d Voluntary dismissal
24-1506 DexCom, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 22 Feb 2024 511 d Voluntary dismissal
24-1376 Abbott Laboratories, Inc. v. DexCom, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 23 Jan 2024 259 d Voluntary dismissal
24-1325 DexCom, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 5 Jan 2024 663 d Appeal Dismissed
24-1326 DexCom, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 5 Jan 2024 560 d Voluntary dismissal
24-1327 DexCom, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 5 Jan 2024 560 d Voluntary dismissal
24-1291 DexCom, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 26 Dec 2023 602 d Unpatentable
2:23-cv-00589 Display Technologies, LLC v. DexCom, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 12 Dec 2023 247 d Dismissed with Prejudice
2:23-cv-00473 Symbology Innovations, LLC v. DexCom, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 5 Oct 2023 294 d Dismissed with Prejudice
23-1795 DexCom, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 26 Apr 2023 252 d Appeal Dismissed
1:23-cv-00239 Abbott Laboratories, Inc. v. DexCom, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 3 Mar 2023 668 d Dismissed with Prejudice
1:22-cv-00605 DexCom, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 5 May 2022 970 d Dismissed with Prejudice
6:21-cv-00690 DexCom, Inc. v. Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 30 Jun 2021 309 d Case Transferred
2020-1510 Arbmetrics, LLC v. DexCom, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 26 Feb 2020 309 d Closed
2019-2398 WaveForm Technologies, Inc. v. DexCom, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 16 Sep 2019 203 d Closed
2019-1970 DexCom, Inc. v. International Trade Commission Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 5 Jun 2019 288 d Closed
2019-1652 DexCom, Inc. v. Agamatrix, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 18 Mar 2019 365 d Closed
1:18-cv-02060 Encoditech, LLC v. DexCom, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 27 Dec 2018 82 d Likely Settlement
2018-2353 DexCom, Inc. v. Agamatrix, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 11 Sep 2018 553 d Closed
3:18-cv-01653 Omni MedSci, Inc. v. DexCom, Inc. Defendant S.D. Cal. 20 Jul 2018 356 d Likely Settlement
2018-1752 DexCom, Inc. v. WaveForm Technologies, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 30 Mar 2018 369 d Closed
2018-1753 DexCom, Inc. v. WaveForm Technologies, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 30 Mar 2018 369 d Closed
2018-1686 DexCom, Inc. v. Agamatrix, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 15 Mar 2018 357 d Closed
3:18-cv-00134 Arbmetrics, LLC v. DexCom, Inc. Defendant S.D. Cal. 19 Jan 2018 739 d Judgment on the Merits
337-TA-1075 Dexcom, Inc. v. AgaMatrix, Inc. Plaintiff United States International Trade Commission 25 Oct 2017 526 d Closed
1:17-cv-01310 DexCom, Inc. v. Agamatrix, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 15 Sep 2017 914 d Stayed
1:17-cv-01111 Bareholdtech, LLC v. DexCom, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 8 Aug 2017 121 d Likely Settlement
1:16-cv-00746 DexCom, Inc. v. InSpark Technologies, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 24 Aug 2016 106 d Voluntary dismissal
2:16-cv-05947 DexCom, Inc. v. Agamatrix, Inc. Plaintiff C.D. Cal. 9 Aug 2016 563 d Judgment on the Merits
3:16-cv-00536 WaveForm Technologies, Inc. v. DexCom, Inc. Defendant D. Or. 28 Mar 2016 1243 d Judgment on the Merits
3:15-cv-00932 DexCom, Inc. v. My Health, Inc. Plaintiff S.D. Cal. 28 Apr 2015 84 d Voluntary dismissal
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming DexCom, Inc. in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what DexCom is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.