Digital Cache, LLC Patent litigation record

Company 24 cases

24 cases on record naming Digital Cache, LLC: 24 as claimant, 0 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

24 cases on record

Cases on record
24
As claimant
24
As respondent
0
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
G06F11/00 · G06F11/10 · G06F12/16 · G06F12/00 · G11B33/08 · G11B23/03 · F16F15/04 · G06F1/16
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
6:22-cv-00182 Digital Cache, LLC v. Acer, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 23 Feb 2022 133 d Voluntary dismissal
6:22-cv-00183 Digital Cache, LLC v. Asustek Computer, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 23 Feb 2022 133 d Voluntary dismissal
6:22-cv-00184 Digital Cache, LLC v. Fujitsu Limited Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 23 Feb 2022 119 d Voluntary dismissal
1:22-cv-00225 Digital Cache, LLC v. Lenovo (United States), Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 22 Feb 2022 129 d Voluntary dismissal
6:22-cv-00180 Digital Cache, LLC v. HP, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 22 Feb 2022 153 d Voluntary dismissal
1:21-cv-01166 Digital Cache, LLC v. Patriot Memory, LLC Plaintiff D. Del. 12 Aug 2021 102 d Voluntary dismissal
1:21-cv-01167 Digital Cache, LLC v. Greenliant Systems, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 12 Aug 2021 13 d Voluntary dismissal
1:21-cv-01168 Digital Cache, LLC v. Netlist, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 12 Aug 2021 120 d Voluntary dismissal
1:21-cv-01169 Digital Cache, LLC v. PNY Technologies, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 12 Aug 2021 29 d Voluntary dismissal
1:21-cv-01170 Digital Cache, LLC v. Storcentric, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 12 Aug 2021 153 d Voluntary dismissal
4:21-cv-02592 Digital Cache, LLC v. LTL Group, Inc. Plaintiff S.D. Tex. 10 Aug 2021 100 d Voluntary dismissal
6:21-cv-00824 Digital Cache, LLC v. Shenzhen Longsys Electronics Co., Ltd. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 10 Aug 2021 321 d Voluntary dismissal
6:21-cv-00732 Digital Cache, LLC v. Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 16 Jul 2021 229 d Voluntary dismissal
6:21-cv-00733 Digital Cache, LLC v. Sharp Corporation Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 16 Jul 2021 56 d Voluntary dismissal
6:21-cv-00719 Digital Cache, LLC v. Giga-Byte Technology Co., Ltd. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 13 Jul 2021 349 d Voluntary dismissal
1:21-cv-00926 Digital Cache, LLC v. Netapp, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 29 Jun 2021 91 d Voluntary dismissal
1:21-cv-00927 Digital Cache, LLC v. Pure Storage, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 29 Jun 2021 247 d Voluntary dismissal
6:21-cv-00676 Digital Cache, LLC v. Panasonic Corporation of North America Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 28 Jun 2021 72 d Voluntary dismissal
6:21-cv-00584 Digital Cache, LLC v. ADATA Technology Co., Ltd. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 8 Jun 2021 132 d Voluntary dismissal
6:21-cv-00362 Digital Cache, LLC v. Avant Technology, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 13 Apr 2021 238 d Voluntary dismissal
6:21-cv-00338 Digital Cache, LLC v. Western Digital Corporation Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 7 Apr 2021 33 d Voluntary dismissal
1:21-cv-00536 Digital Cache, LLC v. Seagate Technology, LLC Plaintiff D. Colo. 23 Feb 2021 3 d Voluntary dismissal
6:21-cv-00163 Digital Cache, LLC v. Kingston Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 23 Feb 2021 248 d Voluntary dismissal
6:21-cv-00164 Digital Cache, LLC v. Transcend Information, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 23 Feb 2021 415 d Procedural Outcome
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Digital Cache, LLC in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Digital Cache is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.