DraftKings, Inc. | Patent Litigation Record

15 cases on record

Cases on record: 15
As claimant: 1
As respondent: 14
Patents held: Not recorded
Core tech: Not recorded

Case no.	Parties	Role	Court	Filed	Duration	Outcome
3:25-cv-04102	Micro-Gaming Ventures, LLC v. DraftKings, Inc.	Defendant	D.N.J.	9 May 2025	325 d	Dismissed with Prejudice
24-2078	DraftKings, Inc. v. AG 18, LLC	Plaintiff	Fed. Cir.	15 Jul 2024	660 d	Unpatentable
24-1821	AG 18, LLC v. DraftKings, Inc.	Defendant	Fed. Cir.	17 May 2024	698 d	Appeal Dismissed
24-1653	Winview IP Holdings, LLC v. DraftKings, Inc.	Defendant	Fed. Cir.	4 Apr 2024	85 d	Voluntary dismissal
22-2275	Beteiro, LLC v. DraftKings, Inc.	Defendant	Fed. Cir.	29 Sep 2022	631 d	Appeal Dismissed
2022-1515	Interactive Games, LLC v. DraftKings, Inc.	Defendant	Fed. Cir.	8 Mar 2022	43 d	Closed
22-1516	Interactive Games, LLC v. DraftKings, Inc.	Defendant	Fed. Cir.	8 Mar 2022	458 d	Appeal Dismissed
22-1517	Interactive Games, LLC v. DraftKings, Inc.	Defendant	Fed. Cir.	8 Mar 2022	458 d	Appeal Dismissed
1:21-cv-20148	Beteiro, LLC v. DraftKings, Inc.	Defendant	D.N.J.	22 Nov 2021	289 d	Case Dismissed
2:21-cv-15737	AG 18, LLC v. DraftKings, Inc.	Defendant	D.N.J.	19 Aug 2021	592 d	Case Stayed
3:21-cv-13405	WinView, Inc. v. DraftKings, Inc.	Defendant	D.N.J.	7 Jul 2021	588 d	Case Terminated
1:19-cv-01105	Interactive Games, LLC v. DraftKings, Inc.	Defendant	D. Del.	14 Jun 2019	1564 d	Case Stayed
1:17-cv-01040	CG Technology Development, LLC v. DraftKings, Inc.	Defendant	D. Del.	28 Jul 2017	1085 d	Procedural Outcome
2:16-cv-00781	CG Technology Development, LLC v. DraftKings, Inc.	Defendant	D. Nev.	7 Apr 2016	477 d	Case Transferred
2:15-cv-01706	Virtual Gaming Technologies, LLC v. DraftKings, Inc.	Defendant	E.D. Tex.	2 Nov 2015	192 d	Likely Settlement

Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming DraftKings, Inc. in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

DraftKings, Inc. Patent litigation record

15 cases on record

See what DraftKings is protecting