Dropbox, Inc. Patent litigation record

Company 51 cases

51 cases on record naming Dropbox, Inc.: 10 as claimant, 41 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

51 cases on record

Cases on record
51
As claimant
10
As respondent
41
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
H04L29/06 · H04L12/24 · H04L29/08
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
1:26-cv-02875 Ubqs-Ip LLC v. Dropbox, Inc. Defendant S.D.N.Y. 8 Apr 2026 82 d Voluntary dismissal
1:26-cv-00022 Lone Star Document Management LLC v. Dropbox, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 5 Jan 2026 113 d Case Dismissed
7:25-cv-00538 VE Opening LLC v. Dropbox, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 19 Nov 2025 239 d Case Transferred
1:25-cv-00297 TG--2006 Holdings, LLC v. Dropbox, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 11 Mar 2025 51 d Voluntary dismissal
1:24-cv-00998 Daedalus Blue, LLC v. Dropbox, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 30 Aug 2024 411 d Case Dismissed
6:24-cv-00074 Secure Ink LLC v. Dropbox, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 5 Feb 2024 56 d Voluntary dismissal
6:23-cv-00830 Gamehancement, LLC v. Dropbox, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 6 Dec 2023 6 d Voluntary dismissal
1:22-cv-01324 Entangled Media, LLC v. Dropbox, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 16 Dec 2022 196 d Case Transferred
6:22-cv-01142 Datanet, LLC v. Dropbox, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 31 Oct 2022 514 d Case Transferred
21-812 WhitServe, LLC v. Dropbox, Inc. Defendant U.S. Supreme Court 1 Dec 2021 40 d Appeal Denied
2021-1522 Dropbox, Inc. v. WhitServe, LLC Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 11 Jan 2021 392 d Closed
2021-1475 WhitServe, LLC v. Dropbox, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 30 Dec 2020 404 d Closed
2021-1395 Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. v. Dropbox, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 15 Dec 2020 153 d Closed
2021-1396 Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. v. Dropbox, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 15 Dec 2020 153 d Closed
2021-1301 Dropbox, Inc. v. Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 24 Nov 2020 174 d Closed
6:20-cv-00806 Express Mobile, Inc. v. Dropbox, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 1 Sep 2020 156 d Voluntary dismissal
6:20-cv-00251 Motion Offense, LLC v. Dropbox, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 31 Mar 2020 1612 d Judgment on the merits for Defendant
4:20-cv-01407 Optima Direct, LLC v. Dropbox, Inc. Defendant N.D. Cal. 25 Feb 2020 273 d Closed
6:20-cv-00070 Justservice.net, LLC v. Dropbox, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 30 Jan 2020 656 d Case Dismissed
1:19-cv-01098 Optima Direct, LLC v. Dropbox, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 12 Nov 2019 101 d Case Transferred
6:19-cv-00525 SynKloud Technologies, LLC v. Dropbox, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 6 Sep 2019 1004 d Likely Settlement
6:19-cv-00526 SynKloud Technologies, LLC v. Dropbox, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 6 Sep 2019 1004 d Case Dismissed
2019-2334 WhitServe, LLC v. Dropbox, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 29 Aug 2019 606 d Closed
1:19-cv-01521 Dropbox, Inc. v. Motion Offense, LLC Plaintiff D. Del. 14 Aug 2019 230 d Case Transferred
2019-2196 Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. v. Dropbox, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 30 Jul 2019 563 d Closed
2019-2199 Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. v. Dropbox, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 30 Jul 2019 563 d Closed
6:19-cv-00316 Data Scape Limited v. Dropbox, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 21 May 2019 142 d Voluntary dismissal
2019-1823 Dropbox, Inc. v. Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 30 Apr 2019 416 d Closed
2019-1765 Dropbox, Inc. v. Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 12 Apr 2019 434 d Closed
2019-1767 Dropbox, Inc. v. Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 12 Apr 2019 434 d Closed
6:19-cv-00023 Data Scape, Ltd. v. Dropbox, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 25 Jan 2019 153 d Case Dismissed
1:19-cv-00048 Data Scape Limited v. Dropbox, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 18 Jan 2019 13 d Voluntary dismissal
1:18-cv-00665 WhitServe, LLC v. Dropbox, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 1 May 2018 450 d Case Dismissed
2018-1342 Dropbox, Inc. v. Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 27 Dec 2017 208 d Closed
2018-1343 Dropbox, Inc. v. Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 27 Dec 2017 208 d Closed
2018-1291 Dropbox, Inc. v. Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 11 Dec 2017 224 d Closed
2018-1292 Dropbox, Inc. v. Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 11 Dec 2017 224 d Closed
2:16-cv-01388 Micoba, LLC v. Dropbox, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 9 Dec 2016 104 d Voluntary dismissal
2:16-cv-01207 Orostream, LLC v. Dropbox, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 28 Oct 2016 139 d Likely Settlement
1:16-cv-00957 Rosebud LMS, Inc. v. Dropbox, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 18 Oct 2016 34 d Voluntary dismissal
2:16-cv-00238 Verify Smart, Corp. v. Dropbox, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 17 Mar 2016 102 d Likely Settlement
4:16-cv-00119 Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. v. Dropbox, Inc. Defendant N.D. Cal. 8 Jan 2016 1258 d Judgment on the Merits
3:15-cv-03064 Hall Data Sync Technologies, LLC v. Dropbox, Inc. Defendant N.D. Cal. 7 Jul 2015 106 d Likely Settlement
6:15-cv-00465 RealTime Data, LLC v. Dropbox, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 8 May 2015 290 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-00593 Elia Data of Texas, LLC v. Dropbox, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 1 May 2015 215 d Likely Settlement
3:15-cv-02192 Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. v. Dropbox, Inc. Defendant D.N.J. 27 Mar 2015 278 d Case Transferred
2015-1380 TLI Communications, LLC v. Dropbox, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 26 Feb 2015 404 d Closed
1:15-cv-00092 Fo2go, LLC v. Dropbox, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 27 Jan 2015 273 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-00003 Hall Data Sync Technologies, LLC v. Dropbox, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 5 Jan 2015 184 d Case Transferred
1:14-cv-01177 Clouding Corp. v. Dropbox, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 10 Sep 2014 195 d Likely Settlement
1:14-cv-00781 TLI Communications, LLC v. Dropbox, Inc. Defendant E.D. Va. 25 Jun 2014 226 d Judgment on the Merits
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Dropbox, Inc. in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Dropbox is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.