Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC Patent litigation record

Company 20 cases

20 cases on record naming Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC: 20 as claimant, 0 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

20 cases on record

Cases on record
20
As claimant
20
As respondent
0
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
H04N7/01 · H04N5/14 · H04N19/587 · G06T7/20 · H04N9/64 · G06T1/20 · G09G · H04N7/12 · H04N11/04 · H04N11/02 · H04N19/51 · H04N11/20 · H04N5/44 · H04N7/26 · H04N7/18 · H04N5/445 · H04N5/45 · H04N7/32 · H03M7/36 · G06K9/36 · H04N9/74 · G06T1/00 · G06T13/00 · H04N19/167 · G09G5/00 · G06T15/04
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
1:19-cv-02125 Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC v. Maxlinear, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 12 Nov 2019 57 d Voluntary dismissal
1:19-cv-01806 Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC v. Qualcomm, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 26 Sep 2019 35 d Voluntary dismissal
1:19-cv-01657 Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC v. Qualcomm, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 5 Sep 2019 56 d Voluntary dismissal
1:19-cv-01529 Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC v. Google, LLC Plaintiff D. Del. 16 Aug 2019 336 d Voluntary dismissal
1:19-cv-01239 Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC v. Amlogic Holdings, Ltd. Plaintiff D. Del. 28 Jun 2019 565 d Voluntary dismissal
1:19-cv-01190 Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC v. Brightcove, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 24 Jun 2019 609 d Voluntary dismissal
2:19-cv-00947 Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC v. HTC Corporation Plaintiff W.D. Wash. 11 Jun 2019 37 d Voluntary dismissal
1:19-cv-01088 Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC v. Dell, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 4 Jun 2019 37 d Likely Settlement
1:18-cv-01977 Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC v. Intel Corporation Plaintiff D. Del. 13 Dec 2018 208 d Voluntary dismissal
1:18-cv-01906 Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC v. Mediatek, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 30 Nov 2018 223 d Voluntary dismissal
1:18-cv-10454 Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC v. Dell, Inc. Plaintiff S.D.N.Y. 9 Nov 2018 207 d Case Transferred
2:18-cv-00470 Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC v. Qualcomm, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 7 Nov 2018 302 d Case Transferred
2:18-cv-00468 Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC v. Lg Electronics, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 6 Nov 2018 237 d Voluntary dismissal
2:18-cv-00469 Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC v. Microsoft Corporation Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 6 Nov 2018 230 d Voluntary dismissal
2:18-cv-00464 Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC v. Apple, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 5 Nov 2018 238 d Voluntary dismissal
2:18-cv-00466 Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC v. Google, LLC Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 5 Nov 2018 284 d Case Transferred
2:18-cv-00459 Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 2 Nov 2018 334 d Case Dismissed
1:18-cv-01726 Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC v. Nvidia, Corp. Plaintiff D. Del. 1 Nov 2018 239 d Voluntary dismissal
1:18-cv-10180 Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC v. HTC Corporation Plaintiff S.D.N.Y. 1 Nov 2018 222 d Case Transferred
1:18-cv-01715 Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 31 Oct 2018 244 d Voluntary dismissal
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Dynamic Data Technologies is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.