eCeipt, LLC Patent litigation record

Company 28 cases

28 cases on record naming eCeipt, LLC: 28 as claimant, 0 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

28 cases on record

Cases on record
28
As claimant
28
As respondent
0
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
G06F15/00
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
6:23-cv-00345 eCeipt, LLC v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 11 May 2023 467 d Dismissed with Prejudice
6:23-cv-00346 eCeipt, LLC v. Zale Corporation Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 11 May 2023 119 d Dismissed with Prejudice
6:22-cv-01223 eCeipt, LLC v. Sams East, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 29 Nov 2022 15 d Voluntary dismissal
6:22-cv-00842 eCeipt, LLC v. Sam's Club Texas, LLC Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 8 Aug 2022 114 d Voluntary dismissal
6:22-cv-00434 eCeipt, LLC v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 29 Apr 2022 150 d Closed
6:22-cv-00435 eCeipt, LLC v. Lowe's Companies Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 29 Apr 2022 150 d Closed
6:21-cv-00447 eCeipt, LLC v. Burlington Coat Factory of Texas, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 30 Apr 2021 132 d Voluntary dismissal
6:20-cv-00818 eCeipt, LLC v. Ulta Beauty, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 8 Sep 2020 87 d Likely Settlement
6:20-cv-00752 eCeipt, LLC v. Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 19 Aug 2020 0 d Voluntary dismissal
6:20-cv-00754 eCeipt, LLC v. Bath & Body Works, LLC Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 19 Aug 2020 553 d Likely Settlement
6:20-cv-00747 eCeipt, LLC v. Victoria's Secret Stores, LLC Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 17 Aug 2020 555 d Likely Settlement
6:19-cv-00469 eCeipt, LLC v. Dillard's, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 14 Aug 2019 623 d Voluntary dismissal
6:19-cv-00283 eCeipt, LLC v. Kendra Scott, LLC Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 29 Apr 2019 92 d Likely Settlement
6:19-cv-00258 eCeipt, LLC v. Old Navy, LLC Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 12 Apr 2019 221 d Likely Settlement
6:19-cv-00032 eCeipt, LLC v. Homegoods, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 1 Feb 2019 173 d Likely Settlement
2:18-cv-00174 eCeipt, LLC v. Academy, Ltd. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 30 Apr 2018 198 d Likely Settlement
2:18-cv-00175 eCeipt, LLC v. Office Depot, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 30 Apr 2018 135 d Likely Settlement
2:18-cv-00176 eCeipt, LLC v. Staples, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 30 Apr 2018 54 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-01111 eCeipt, LLC v. Caleres, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 7 Oct 2016 178 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-01112 eCeipt, LLC v. Recreational Equipment, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 7 Oct 2016 150 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-01105 eCeipt, LLC v. Ann, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 6 Oct 2016 76 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-01106 eCeipt, LLC v. Best Buy Co., Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 6 Oct 2016 99 d Other
2:16-cv-00419 eCeipt, LLC v. GNC Holdings, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 19 Apr 2016 113 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-01928 eCeipt, LLC v. Square, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 30 Nov 2015 113 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-01929 eCeipt, LLC v. Nordstrom, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 30 Nov 2015 84 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-01672 eCeipt, LLC v. The Home Depot, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 21 Oct 2015 153 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-01423 eCeipt, LLC v. Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 21 Aug 2015 143 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-01425 eCeipt, LLC v. Macy's, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 21 Aug 2015 214 d Likely Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming eCeipt, LLC in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what eCeipt is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.