Ecobee, Inc Patent litigation record

Company 13 cases

13 cases on record naming Ecobee, Inc: 2 as claimant, 11 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

13 cases on record

Cases on record
13
As claimant
2
As respondent
11
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
Not recorded
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
337-TA-1185 EcoFactor, Inc v. Ecobee, Ltd. Defendant United States International Trade Commission 2 May 2023 216 d Case Withdrawn
22-1767 Ecobee, Inc v. EcoFactor, Inc Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 10 May 2022 638 d Vacated and Remanded
2:22-cv-00072 Ollnova Technologies Limited v. Ecobee, Inc Defendant E.D. Tex. 8 Mar 2022 724 d Judgment on the merits for Plaintiff
6:22-cv-00033 EcoFactor, Inc v. Ecobee, Inc Defendant W.D. Tex. 10 Jan 2022 722 d Dismissed with Prejudice
6:22-cv-00018 Cedar Lane Technologies, Inc. v. Ecobee, Inc Defendant W.D. Tex. 6 Jan 2022 36 d Voluntary dismissal
6:21-cv-00748 Causam Enterprises, Inc. v. Ecobee, Inc Defendant W.D. Tex. 22 Jul 2021 1687 d Closed
6:21-cv-00428 EcoFactor, Inc v. Ecobee, Inc Defendant W.D. Tex. 28 Apr 2021 847 d Judgment on the merits for Plaintiff
1:21-cv-00323 Ecobee, Inc v. EcoFactor, Inc Plaintiff D. Del. 2 Mar 2021 1037 d Dismissed with Prejudice
6:20-cv-00694 Portus Singapore Pte, Ltd. v. Ecobee, Inc Defendant W.D. Tex. 29 Jul 2020 511 d Voluntary dismissal
1:19-cv-12325 EcoFactor, Inc v. Ecobee, Inc Defendant D. Mass. 12 Nov 2019 64 d Stayed
1:17-cv-12276 Banertek, LLC v. Ecobee, Inc Defendant D. Mass. 17 Nov 2017 80 d Voluntary dismissal
2:17-cv-00046 Thermo Dynamic Solutions, LLC v. Ecobee, Ltd. Defendant E.D. Tex. 13 Jan 2017 158 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-00581 FTC Sensors, LLC v. Ecobee, Inc Defendant E.D. Tex. 1 Jun 2016 72 d Likely Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Ecobee, Inc in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Ecobee is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.