Ectolink, LLC Patent litigation record

Company 24 cases

24 cases on record naming Ectolink, LLC: 24 as claimant, 0 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

24 cases on record

Cases on record
24
As claimant
24
As respondent
0
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
G06Q20/00 · G06Q20/02 · G06Q20/04 · G06Q20/10
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
6:15-cv-00759 Ectolink, LLC v. Commerce Bank Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 14 Aug 2015 75 d Voluntary dismissal
6:15-cv-00760 Ectolink, LLC v. Elavon, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 14 Aug 2015 472 d Likely Settlement
6:15-cv-00761 Ectolink, LLC v. First Data Merchant Services Corporation Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 14 Aug 2015 60 d Voluntary dismissal
6:15-cv-00762 Ectolink, LLC v. First National Bank of Omaha Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 14 Aug 2015 136 d Voluntary dismissal
6:15-cv-00763 Ectolink, LLC v. Heartland Payment Systems, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 14 Aug 2015 73 d Voluntary dismissal
6:15-cv-00764 Ectolink, LLC v. Meridian Bank Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 14 Aug 2015 154 d Likely Settlement
6:15-cv-00767 Ectolink, LLC v. Merrick Bank Corporation Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 14 Aug 2015 80 d Voluntary dismissal
6:15-cv-00768 Ectolink, LLC v. Santander Bank, N.A. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 14 Aug 2015 95 d Voluntary dismissal
6:15-cv-00769 Ectolink, LLC v. Suntrust Banks, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 14 Aug 2015 69 d Likely Settlement
6:15-cv-00770 Ectolink, LLC v. Synovus Bank Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 14 Aug 2015 101 d Voluntary dismissal
6:15-cv-00771 Ectolink, LLC v. The Independent Bankers Bank Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 14 Aug 2015 110 d Voluntary dismissal
6:15-cv-00772 Ectolink, LLC v. Total System Services, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 14 Aug 2015 75 d Voluntary dismissal
6:15-cv-00773 Ectolink, LLC v. U.S. Bancorp Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 14 Aug 2015 472 d Likely Settlement
6:15-cv-00774 Ectolink, LLC v. Vantiv, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 14 Aug 2015 63 d Voluntary dismissal
6:15-cv-00775 Ectolink, LLC v. Woodforest National Bank Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 14 Aug 2015 19 d Voluntary dismissal
6:15-cv-00776 Ectolink, LLC v. WorldPay US, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 14 Aug 2015 462 d Likely Settlement
6:15-cv-00750 Ectolink, LLC v. HSBC Bank USA, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 13 Aug 2015 144 d Likely Settlement
6:15-cv-00751 Ectolink, LLC v. KeyCorp, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 13 Aug 2015 83 d Voluntary dismissal
6:15-cv-00752 Ectolink, LLC v. M&T Bank Corporation Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 13 Aug 2015 70 d Likely Settlement
6:15-cv-00753 Ectolink, LLC v. Applied Bank Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 13 Aug 2015 78 d Voluntary dismissal
6:15-cv-00754 Ectolink, LLC v. BancorpSouth Bank Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 13 Aug 2015 41 d Voluntary dismissal
6:15-cv-00755 Ectolink, LLC v. Bank of Hawaii Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 13 Aug 2015 116 d Likely Settlement
6:15-cv-00756 Ectolink, LLC v. Capital One N.A. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 13 Aug 2015 76 d Voluntary dismissal
6:15-cv-00757 Ectolink, LLC v. Comerica Bank Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 13 Aug 2015 78 d Voluntary dismissal
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Ectolink, LLC in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Ectolink is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.