Electronic Scripting Products, Inc. Patent litigation record

Company 17 cases

17 cases on record naming Electronic Scripting Products, Inc.: 17 as claimant, 0 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

17 cases on record

Cases on record
17
As claimant
17
As respondent
0
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
G09G5/08 · G06F3/01 · G06F3/033 · G06F3/0354 · G06K9/00 · G02B27/01 · G06T7/00 · H04N5/232 · G06T7/20 · H04N23/80
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
1:25-cv-01668 Electronic Scripting Products, Inc. v. Creepy Greens Entertainment Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 17 Oct 2025 195 d Dismissed with Prejudice
1:25-cv-00256 Electronic Scripting Products, Inc. v. Designing Digitally, Inc. Plaintiff S.D. Ohio 21 Apr 2025 260 d Closed
1:25-cv-00169 Electronic Scripting Products, Inc. v. A2 Consulting, LLC Plaintiff S.D. Ohio 17 Mar 2025 147 d Voluntary dismissal
2:25-cv-00066 Electronic Scripting Products, Inc. v. Green Family Entertainment LLC Plaintiff W.D. Wash. 10 Jan 2025 172 d Voluntary dismissal
1:24-cv-02026 Electronic Scripting Products, Inc. v. A.W. Faber-Castell USA, Inc. Plaintiff N.D. Ohio 20 Nov 2024 47 d Voluntary dismissal
2:24-cv-01082 Electronic Scripting Products, Inc. v. Fresh Consulting Inc Plaintiff W.D. Wash. 23 Jul 2024 115 d Voluntary dismissal
1:24-cv-00930 Electronic Scripting Products, Inc. v. Bendon, Inc. Plaintiff N.D. Ohio 28 May 2024 125 d Voluntary dismissal
2:23-cv-01834 Electronic Scripting Products, Inc. v. Endeavor One Inc Plaintiff W.D. Wash. 29 Nov 2023 670 d Voluntary dismissal
6:23-cv-00707 Electronic Scripting Products, Inc. v. Havenly, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 13 Oct 2023 47 d Voluntary dismissal
1:23-cv-01903 Electronic Scripting Products, Inc. v. Digital Strategy Group, LLC Plaintiff N.D. Ohio 29 Sep 2023 83 d Voluntary dismissal
6:23-cv-00649 Electronic Scripting Products, Inc. v. Andromeda Entertainment Limited Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 6 Sep 2023 569 d Voluntary dismissal
2:23-cv-01344 Electronic Scripting Products, Inc. v. Jones Soda, Co. Plaintiff W.D. Wash. 30 Aug 2023 127 d Dismissed with Prejudice
6:23-cv-00194 Electronic Scripting Products, Inc. v. EQ3, Ltd. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 14 Mar 2023 185 d Voluntary dismissal
6:23-cv-00119 Electronic Scripting Products, Inc. v. Herschel Supply Company Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 15 Feb 2023 153 d Voluntary dismissal
6:22-cv-00664 Electronic Scripting Products, Inc. v. Nextech AR Solutions Corporation Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 24 Jun 2022 145 d Consent Judgment
2022-1544 Electronic Scripting Products, Inc. v. HTC America, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 17 Mar 2022 57 d Closed
3:17-cv-05806 Electronic Scripting Products, Inc. v. HTC America, Inc. Plaintiff N.D. Cal. 9 Oct 2017 1558 d Likely Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Electronic Scripting Products, Inc. in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Electronic Scripting Products is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.