Eolas Technologies Incorporated Patent litigation record

Company 12 cases

12 cases on record naming Eolas Technologies Incorporated: 11 as claimant, 1 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

12 cases on record

Cases on record
12
As claimant
11
As respondent
1
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
G06F9/46 · G06F9/50 · G06F17/30
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
23-1184 Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Amazon.com, Inc. Plaintiff U.S. Supreme Court 1 May 2024 159 d Appeal Dismissed
22-1932 Eolas Technologies, Inc. v. Google, LLC Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 24 Jun 2022 587 d Appeal Dismissed
22-1933 Eolas Technologies, Inc. v. Google, LLC Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 24 Jun 2022 587 d Appeal Dismissed
22-1934 Eolas Technologies, Inc. v. Walmart, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 24 Jun 2022 587 d Appeal Dismissed
22-1935 Eolas Technologies, Inc. v. Google, LLC Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 24 Jun 2022 587 d Appeal Dismissed
4:17-cv-03022 Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Amazon.com, Inc. Plaintiff N.D. Cal. 26 May 2017 1816 d Procedural Outcome
4:17-cv-03023 Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Walmart, Inc. Plaintiff N.D. Cal. 25 May 2017 1817 d Procedural Outcome
4:17-cv-01138 Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Google, LLC Plaintiff N.D. Cal. 6 Mar 2017 1897 d Procedural Outcome
4:15-cv-05446 Google, LLC v. Eolas Technologies Incorporated Defendant N.D. Cal. 25 Nov 2015 2364 d Likely Settlement
6:15-cv-01038 Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Amazon.com, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 24 Nov 2015 546 d Case Transferred
6:15-cv-01039 Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Google, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 24 Nov 2015 475 d Case Transferred
6:15-cv-01040 Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 24 Nov 2015 546 d Case Transferred
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Eolas Technologies Incorporated in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Eolas Technologies is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.