Epic Systems Corporation | Patent Litigation Record

11 cases on record

Cases on record: 11
As claimant: 2
As respondent: 9
Patents held: Not recorded
Core tech: Not recorded

Case no.	Parties	Role	Court	Filed	Duration	Outcome
25-1289	Decapolis Systems, LLC v. Epic Systems, Corp.	Defendant	Fed. Cir.	16 Dec 2024	302 d	Voluntary dismissal
3:24-cv-00030	SynKloud Technologies, LLC v. Epic Systems, Corp.	Defendant	W.D. Wis.	17 Jan 2024	125 d	Dismissed with Prejudice
23-1302	Decapolis Systems, LLC v. Epic Systems, Corp.	Defendant	Fed. Cir.	29 Dec 2022	462 d	Appeal Dismissed
9:22-cv-80276	Epic Systems, Corp. v. GreatGigz Solutions, LLC	Plaintiff	S.D. Fla.	18 Feb 2022	1181 d	Judgment on the merits for Plaintiff
9:22-cv-80173	Epic Systems, Corp. v. Decapolis Systems, LLC	Plaintiff	S.D. Fla.	2 Feb 2022	303 d	Case Dismissed
6:21-cv-00434	Decapolis Systems, LLC v. Epic Systems Corporation	Defendant	W.D. Tex.	29 Apr 2021	235 d	Voluntary dismissal
3:21-cv-00257	DatRec, LLC v. Epic Systems Corporation	Defendant	W.D. Wis.	16 Apr 2021	82 d	Voluntary dismissal
2:16-cv-00963	St. Luke Technologies, LLC v. Epic Systems Corporation	Defendant	E.D. Tex.	29 Aug 2016	177 d	Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-01561	Preservation Wellness Technologies, LLC v. Epic Systems Corporation	Defendant	E.D. Tex.	1 Oct 2015	223 d	Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-01487	Preservation Wellness Technologies, LLC v. Epic Systems Corporation	Defendant	E.D. Tex.	3 Sep 2015	32 d	Voluntary dismissal
6:14-cv-00626	Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Epic Systems Corporation	Defendant	E.D. Tex.	18 Jul 2014	832 d	Likely Settlement

Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Epic Systems Corporation in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Epic Systems Corporation Patent litigation record

11 cases on record

See what Epic Systems is protecting