Epistar Corporation | Patent Litigation Record

13 cases on record

Cases on record: 13
As claimant: 8
As respondent: 5
Patents held: Not recorded
Core tech: H01L33/00 · H01L25/075 · H01L33/20 · H01L33/38

Case no.	Parties	Role	Court	Filed	Duration	Outcome
24-1266	Lowe's Companies, Inc. v. Epistar, Corp.	Defendant	Fed. Cir.	15 Dec 2023	228 d	Case Remanded
2:23-cv-07283	Epistar, Corp. v. Lowe's Companies, Inc.	Plaintiff	C.D. Cal.	1 Sep 2023	348 d	Dismissed with Prejudice
6:22-cv-00526	Epistar, Corp. v. Amazon.com. Inc.	Plaintiff	W.D. Tex.	24 May 2022	547 d	Dismissed with Prejudice
6:20-cv-00420	Epistar, Corp. v. Lowe's Companies, Inc.	Plaintiff	W.D. Tex.	22 May 2020	1541 d	Dismissed with Prejudice
1:19-cv-01626	Epistar Corporation v. GMY Lighting Technology Co., Ltd.	Plaintiff	D. Del.	30 Aug 2019	244 d	Voluntary dismissal
8:18-cv-00799	Epistar Corporation v. V-TAC USA, Corp.	Plaintiff	C.D. Cal.	7 May 2018	107 d	Likely Settlement
2:17-cv-08255	Epistar Corporation v. All Star Lighting Supplies, Inc.	Plaintiff	D.N.J.	13 Oct 2017	238 d	Out-of-court Settlement
2:17-cv-03219	Epistar, Corp. v. Lowe's Companies, Inc.	Plaintiff	C.D. Cal.	28 Apr 2017	2397 d	Case Accepted in Part
2016-2595	Trustees of Boston University v. Epistar Corporation	Defendant	Fed. Cir.	31 Aug 2016	693 d	Closed
3:16-cv-04981	Epistar Corporation v. Adamax, Inc.	Plaintiff	N.D. Cal.	30 Aug 2016	55 d	Voluntary dismissal
2016-2577	Trustees of Boston University v. Epistar Corporation	Defendant	Fed. Cir.	29 Aug 2016	695 d	Closed
2016-2578	Trustees of Boston University v. Epistar Corporation	Defendant	Fed. Cir.	29 Aug 2016	695 d	Closed
1:12-cv-12326	Trustees of Boston University v. Epistar Corporation	Defendant	D. Mass.	14 Dec 2012	1384 d	Procedural Outcome

Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Epistar Corporation in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Epistar Corporation Patent litigation record

13 cases on record

See what Epistar is protecting