Ethicon, LLC Patent litigation record

Company 20 cases

20 cases on record naming Ethicon, LLC: 8 as claimant, 12 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

20 cases on record

Cases on record
20
As claimant
8
As respondent
12
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
A61B17/068 · A61B17/072 · A61B19/00 · A61B17/00
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
1:25-cv-00064 Rex Medical LP v. Ethicon, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 16 Jan 2025 294 d Dismissed with Prejudice
6:24-cv-00556 Rex Medical, LP v. Ethicon, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 18 Oct 2024 89 d Case Transferred
2:23-cv-00293 Cicas IP, LLC v. Ethicon, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 22 Jun 2023 257 d Dismissed with Prejudice
22-1111 Ethicon, LLC v. International Trade Commission Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 2 Nov 2021 570 d Appeal Dismissed
2021-1995 Ethicon, LLC v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 2 Jun 2021 355 d Closed
2021-1997 Ethicon, LLC v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 2 Jun 2021 355 d Closed
2021-1601 Ethicon, LLC v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 29 Jan 2021 475 d Closed
2020-1546 Intuitive Surgical, Inc. v. Ethicon, LLC Defendant Fed. Cir. 9 Mar 2020 532 d Closed
2020-1528 Ethicon, LLC v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 4 Mar 2020 537 d Closed
2020-1480 Intuitive Surgical, Inc. v. Ethicon, LLC Defendant Fed. Cir. 19 Feb 2020 723 d Closed
2020-1481 Intuitive Surgical, Inc. v. Ethicon, LLC Defendant Fed. Cir. 19 Feb 2020 723 d Closed
2020-1482 Intuitive Surgical, Inc. v. Ethicon, LLC Defendant Fed. Cir. 19 Feb 2020 723 d Closed
2020-1453 Ethicon, LLC v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 10 Feb 2020 389 d Closed
2020-1432 Intuitive Surgical, Inc. v. Ethicon, LLC Defendant Fed. Cir. 5 Feb 2020 82 d Closed
2020-1433 Intuitive Surgical, Inc. v. Ethicon, LLC Defendant Fed. Cir. 5 Feb 2020 82 d Closed
2020-1434 Intuitive Surgical, Inc. v. Ethicon, LLC Defendant Fed. Cir. 5 Feb 2020 82 d Closed
1:18-cv-01325 Ethicon, LLC v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 27 Aug 2018 1305 d Closed
1:17-cv-01084 Board of Regents, The University of Texas System v. Ethicon, Inc Defendant W.D. Tex. 15 Nov 2017 1384 d Voluntary dismissal
1:17-cv-00871 Ethicon, LLC v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 30 Jun 2017 2532 d Dismissed with Prejudice
337-TA-913 Baxter Healthcare Corporation v. Ethicon, Inc. Defendant United States International Trade Commission 7 Apr 2014 385 d Closed
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Ethicon, LLC in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Ethicon is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.