Everlight Electronics Co., Ltd Patent litigation record

Company 18 cases

18 cases on record naming Everlight Electronics Co., Ltd: 7 as claimant, 11 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

18 cases on record

Cases on record
18
As claimant
7
As respondent
11
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
H01L33/48 · H01L23/00 · H01L33/62 · H01L33/60 · H01L33/00 · H01L33/38 · B60Q1/26 · H01L23/495 · H01L23/48
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
6:23-cv-00481 Everlight Electronics Co., Ltd v. IKEA US Retail, LLC Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 5 Jul 2023 551 d Case Settled
6:23-cv-00439 Everlight Electronics Co., Ltd v. Walmart, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 9 Jun 2023 840 d Voluntary dismissal
2:23-cv-00126 Everlight Electronics Co., Ltd v. IKEA US Retail, LLC Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 27 Mar 2023 102 d Dismissed without Prejudice
2020-1360 Trustees of Boston University v. Everlight Electronics Co., Ltd Defendant Fed. Cir. 17 Jan 2020 411 d Closed
1:20-cv-00049 Bench Walk Lighting, LLC v. Everlight Electronics Co., Ltd Defendant D. Del. 14 Jan 2020 1351 d Dismissed with Prejudice
17-1707 Nichia Corporation v. Everlight Electronics Co., Ltd Defendant U.S. Supreme Court 26 Jun 2018 97 d Appeal Denied
4:17-cv-03363 Everlight Electronics Co., Ltd v. Bridgelux, Inc. Plaintiff N.D. Cal. 10 Jun 2017 552 d Likely Settlement
2:17-cv-04273 Document Security Systems, Inc. v. Everlight Electronics Co., Ltd Defendant C.D. Cal. 8 Jun 2017 414 d Stayed
2:17-cv-00310 Document Security Systems, Inc. v. Everlight Electronics Co., Ltd Defendant E.D. Tex. 13 Apr 2017 56 d Voluntary dismissal
2016-2591 Trustees of Boston University v. Everlight Electronics Co., Ltd Defendant Fed. Cir. 31 Aug 2016 693 d Closed
2016-2592 Trustees of Boston University v. Everlight Electronics Co., Ltd Defendant Fed. Cir. 31 Aug 2016 693 d Closed
2016-2593 Trustees of Boston University v. Everlight Electronics Co., Ltd Defendant Fed. Cir. 31 Aug 2016 693 d Closed
2016-2576 Trustees of Boston University v. Everlight Electronics Co., Ltd Defendant Fed. Cir. 29 Aug 2016 695 d Closed
2016-1611 Everlight Electronics Co., Ltd v. Nichia Corporation Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 23 Feb 2016 681 d Closed
2016-1577 Everlight Electronics Co., Ltd v. Nichia Corporation Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 17 Feb 2016 687 d Closed
2:13-cv-00702 Nichia Corporation v. Everlight Electronics Co., Ltd Defendant E.D. Tex. 11 Sep 2013 895 d Likely Settlement
1:12-cv-11935 Trustees of Boston University v. Everlight Electronics Co., Ltd Defendant D. Mass. 17 Oct 2012 1442 d Procedural Outcome
4:12-cv-11758 Everlight Electronics Co., Ltd v. Nichia Corporation Plaintiff E.D. Mich. 19 Apr 2012 1376 d Judgment on the Merits
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Everlight Electronics Co., Ltd in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Everlight Electronics is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.