Evolved Wireless, LLC Patent litigation record

Company 21 cases

21 cases on record naming Evolved Wireless, LLC: 20 as claimant, 1 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

21 cases on record

Cases on record
21
As claimant
20
As respondent
1
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
H04W36/00 · H04W36/08 · H04W48/12 · H04B1/00
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
24-2280 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Evolved Wireless, LLC Defendant Fed. Cir. 30 Aug 2024 731 d Appeal Dismissed
24-2234 Evolved Wireless, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 19 Aug 2024 742 d Appeal Dismissed
337-TA-1253 Evolved Wireless, LLC v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. Plaintiff United States International Trade Commission 8 Mar 2021 351 d Closed
2:21-cv-00033 Evolved Wireless, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 1 Feb 2021 1045 d Case Dismissed
2020-1363 Evolved Wireless, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 17 Jan 2020 375 d Closed
2020-1335 Evolved Wireless, LLC v. HTC Corporation Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 8 Jan 2020 384 d Closed
2020-1337 Evolved Wireless, LLC v. Motorola Mobility, LLC Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 8 Jan 2020 384 d Closed
2020-1339 Evolved Wireless, LLC v. ZTE (USA), Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 8 Jan 2020 384 d Closed
2020-1340 Evolved Wireless, LLC v. Microsoft, Corp. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 8 Jan 2020 384 d Closed
2019-2362 Evolved Wireless, LLC v. Apple, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 5 Sep 2019 292 d Closed
1:18-cv-25116 Evolved Wireless, LLC v. Blu Products, Inc. Plaintiff S.D. Fla. 6 Dec 2018 138 d Voluntary dismissal
2018-2008 Evolved Wireless, LLC v. ZTE (USA), Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 25 May 2018 497 d Closed
2018-2009 Evolved Wireless, LLC v. ZTE (USA), Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 25 May 2018 497 d Closed
2018-2010 Evolved Wireless, LLC v. Apple, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 25 May 2018 497 d Closed
2018-2011 Evolved Wireless, LLC v. Apple, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 25 May 2018 497 d Closed
1:15-cv-00542 Evolved Wireless, LLC v. Apple, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 25 Jun 2015 1506 d Judgment on the Merits
1:15-cv-00543 Evolved Wireless, LLC v. HTC Corporation Plaintiff D. Del. 25 Jun 2015 1622 d Procedural Outcome
1:15-cv-00544 Evolved Wireless, LLC v. Lenovo Group, Ltd. Plaintiff D. Del. 25 Jun 2015 1649 d Likely Settlement
1:15-cv-00545 Evolved Wireless, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Plaintiff D. Del. 25 Jun 2015 1657 d Judgment on the Merits
1:15-cv-00546 Evolved Wireless, LLC v. ZTE Corporation Plaintiff D. Del. 25 Jun 2015 1622 d Procedural Outcome
1:15-cv-00547 Evolved Wireless, LLC v. Microsoft Corporation Plaintiff D. Del. 25 Jun 2015 1622 d Procedural Outcome
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Evolved Wireless, LLC in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Evolved Wireless is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.