FedEx Corporation Patent litigation record

Company 23 cases

23 cases on record naming FedEx Corporation: 3 as claimant, 20 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

23 cases on record

Cases on record
23
As claimant
3
As respondent
20
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
Not recorded
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
2:24-cv-00736 Ortiz & Associates Consulting, LLC v. FedEx Corporation Defendant E.D. Tex. 9 Sep 2024 331 d Voluntary dismissal
2:24-cv-00044 WirelessWerx IP, LLC v. FedEx Corporation Defendant E.D. Tex. 25 Jan 2024 249 d Voluntary dismissal
24-1235 FedEx Corporation v. Qualcomm, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 6 Dec 2023 875 d Case Reversed
24-1236 FedEx Corporation v. Qualcomm, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 6 Dec 2023 875 d Vacated and Remanded
24-1237 FedEx Corporation v. Qualcomm, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 6 Dec 2023 875 d Appeal Dismissed in Part
1:22-cv-01289 Digi Portal, LLC v. FedEx Corporation Defendant D. Del. 30 Sep 2022 125 d Voluntary dismissal
2:22-cv-00110 Transcend Shipping Systems, LLC v. FedEx Corporation Defendant E.D. Tex. 12 Apr 2022 114 d Voluntary dismissal
4:20-cv-00305 Communication Interface Technologies, LLC v. FedEx Corporation Defendant E.D. Tex. 13 Apr 2020 66 d Voluntary dismissal
2:19-cv-00018 Flectere, LLC v. Fedex, corp. Defendant E.D. Tex. 18 Jan 2019 73 d Voluntary dismissal
2019-1065 Intellectual Ventures II, LLC v. FedEx Corporation Defendant Fed. Cir. 11 Oct 2018 202 d Closed
2018-2409 Intellectual Ventures II, LLC v. FedEx Corporation Defendant Fed. Cir. 24 Sep 2018 221 d Closed
2018-2401 Intellectual Ventures II, LLC v. FedEx Corporation Defendant Fed. Cir. 20 Sep 2018 225 d Closed
2018-2402 Intellectual Ventures II, LLC v. FedEx Corporation Defendant Fed. Cir. 20 Sep 2018 225 d Closed
2018-2372 Intellectual Ventures II, LLC v. FedEx Corporation Defendant Fed. Cir. 17 Sep 2018 234 d Closed
2018-2373 Intellectual Ventures II, LLC v. FedEx Corporation Defendant Fed. Cir. 17 Sep 2018 449 d Closed
2:17-cv-02462 Human Sciences HC, Ltd. v. FedEx, Corp. Defendant W.D. Tenn. 5 Jul 2017 405 d Procedural Outcome
1:16-cv-11449 Human Sciences HC, Ltd. v. Fedex, corp. Defendant N.D. Ill. 19 Dec 2016 183 d Case Transferred
2:16-cv-00980 Intellectual Ventures II, LLC v. FedEx Corporation Defendant E.D. Tex. 31 Aug 2016 628 d Judgment on the Merits
1:16-cv-04029 MacNeil IP, LLC v. FedEx Corporation Defendant N.D. Ill. 5 Apr 2016 76 d Voluntary dismissal
2:15-cv-00751 Loramax LLC v. FedEx Corporation Defendant E.D. Tex. 15 May 2015 186 d Voluntary dismissal
3:15-cv-00397 Avioniqs, LLC v. FedEx Corporation Defendant N.D. Tex. 6 Feb 2015 102 d Likely Settlement
4:14-cv-04894 IpVenture, Inc. v. FedEx Corporation Defendant N.D. Cal. 4 Nov 2014 955 d Likely Settlement
4:11-cv-05367 IpVenture, Inc. v. FedEx Corporation Defendant N.D. Cal. 4 Nov 2011 2051 d Likely Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming FedEx Corporation in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what FedEx is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.