Fitbit, Inc. Patent litigation record

Company 41 cases

41 cases on record naming Fitbit, Inc.: 15 as claimant, 26 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

41 cases on record

Cases on record
41
As claimant
15
As respondent
26
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
G01P15/00 · A61B5/00 · A63B24/00 · A61B5/024 · G08B23/00 · G08B21/04 · G08B25/01 · A61B5/11 · A61B5/0205 · A61B5/02 · G07F17/32 · A61B5/04 · G06F19/00 · A61B5/145 · H04B7/00 · H04B5/48 · B42D1/00 · B42D19/00 · B42D15/00 · G09B19/00
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
24-1479 Philips North America, LLC v. Fitbit, LLC Defendant Fed. Cir. 15 Feb 2024 558 d Appeal Dismissed
23-2286 Philips North America, LLC v. Fitbit, LLC Defendant Fed. Cir. 16 Aug 2023 124 d Appeal Dismissed
23-1526 Cellspin Soft, Inc. v. Fitbit, LLC Defendant Fed. Cir. 22 Feb 2023 618 d Appeal Dismissed in Part
23-1065 Fitbit, LLC v. Koninklijke Philips Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 21 Oct 2022 570 d Unpatentable
22-2263 Fitbit, LLC v. Koninklijke Philips Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 28 Sep 2022 593 d Unpatentable
22-2025 Cellspin Soft, Inc. v. Fitbit, LLC Defendant Fed. Cir. 15 Jul 2022 840 d Appeal Dismissed
3:22-cv-02847 Context Directions, LLC v. Fitbit, Inc. Defendant N.D. Cal. 13 May 2022 26 d Voluntary dismissal
22-1279 Fitbit, LLC v. Philips North America, LLC Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 20 Dec 2021 472 d Unpatentable
21-2041 Valencell, Inc. v. Fitbit, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 11 Jun 2021 909 d Unpatentable
1:20-cv-11611 Fitbit, Inc. v. Koninklijke Philips Plaintiff D. Mass. 28 Aug 2020 915 d Voluntary dismissal
1:20-cv-11613 Fitbit, LLC v. Koninklijke Philips, N.V. Plaintiff D. Mass. 28 Aug 2020 452 d Likely Settlement
4:20-cv-02371 Fitbit, Inc. v. Koninklijke Philips, N.V. Plaintiff N.D. Cal. 8 Apr 2020 140 d Closed
3:20-cv-02246 Fitbit, Inc. v. Koninklijke Philips, N.V. Plaintiff N.D. Cal. 2 Apr 2020 98 d Case Transferred
337-TA-1190 Koninklijke Philips, N.V. v. Fitbit, Inc. Defendant United States International Trade Commission 15 Jan 2020 453 d Closed
1:19-cv-11586 Philips North America, LLC v. Fitbit LLC Defendant D. Mass. 22 Jul 2019 1635 d Case Dismissed
5:19-cv-04075 Transaction Secure, LLC v. Fitbit, Inc. Defendant N.D. Cal. 16 Jul 2019 101 d Voluntary dismissal
2019-1879 Blackbird Tech, LLC v. Fitbit, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 15 May 2019 449 d Closed
2019-1048 Fitbit, Inc. v. Valencell, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 9 Oct 2018 638 d Closed
2018-2178 Cellspin Soft, Inc. v. Fitbit, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 23 Jul 2018 337 d Closed
2018-1817 Cellspin Soft, Inc. v. Fitbit, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 13 Apr 2018 438 d Closed
4:17-cv-06543 Blue Sky Networks, LLC v. Fitbit, Inc. Defendant N.D. Cal. 10 Nov 2017 227 d Likely Settlement
4:17-cv-05928 Cellspin Soft, Inc. v. Fitbit, Inc. Defendant N.D. Cal. 16 Oct 2017 1703 d Judgment on the Merits
3:17-cv-05068 Smart Wearable Technologies, Inc. v. Fitbit, Inc. Defendant N.D. Cal. 1 Sep 2017 159 d Judgment on the Merits
5:17-cv-03886 Immersion Corporation v. Fitbit, Inc. Defendant N.D. Cal. 10 Jul 2017 364 d Voluntary dismissal
3:17-cv-01139 Fitbit, Inc. v. AliphCom, Inc. Plaintiff N.D. Cal. 6 Mar 2017 304 d Out-of-court Settlement
3:16-cv-00077 Smart Wearable Technologies, Inc. v. Fitbit, Inc. Defendant W.D. Va. 14 Nov 2016 288 d Case Transferred
1:16-cv-00683 Blackbird Tech, LLC v. Fitbit, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 8 Aug 2016 1656 d Case Dismissed
6:16-cv-00414 Tellus Fit, LLC v. Fitbit, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 13 May 2016 363 d Likely Settlement
3:16-cv-02443 Logantree, LP v. Fitbit, Inc. Defendant N.D. Cal. 5 May 2016 314 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-00209 Guyzar, LLC v. Fitbit, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 14 Mar 2016 121 d Likely Settlement
5:16-cv-00118 Fitbit, Inc. v. AliphCom, Inc. Plaintiff N.D. Cal. 8 Jan 2016 725 d Likely Settlement
5:16-cv-00002 Valencell, Inc. v. Fitbit, Inc. Defendant E.D.N.C. 4 Jan 2016 3062 d Dismissed with Prejudice
337-TA-973 Fitbit, Inc. v. AliphCom, Inc. d/b/a Jawbone Plaintiff United States International Trade Commission 7 Dec 2015 422 d Closed
1:15-cv-00990 Fitbit, Inc. v. AliphCom, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 29 Oct 2015 489 d Case Transferred
2:15-cv-01575 Logantree, LP v. Fitbit, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 2 Oct 2015 213 d Case Transferred
5:15-cv-04073 Fitbit, Inc. v. AliphCom, Inc. Plaintiff N.D. Cal. 8 Sep 2015 828 d Likely Settlement
1:15-cv-00775 Fitbit, Inc. v. AliphCom, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 3 Sep 2015 125 d Case Transferred
337-TA-963 AliphCom, Inc. d/b/a Jawbone v. Fitbit, Inc. Defendant United States International Trade Commission 21 Aug 2015 426 d Closed
4:15-cv-02579 AliphCom, Inc. v. Fitbit, Inc. Defendant N.D. Cal. 10 Jun 2015 925 d Likely Settlement
3:14-cv-03338 iLife Technologies, Inc. v. Fitbit, Inc. Defendant N.D. Cal. 23 Jul 2014 232 d Likely Settlement
1:14-cv-01267 Fitbit, Inc. v. Fitbug, Inc. Plaintiff N.D. Ill. 20 Feb 2014 721 d Likely Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Fitbit, Inc. in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Fitbit is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.