Flexiworld Technologies, Inc. Patent litigation record

Company 21 cases

21 cases on record naming Flexiworld Technologies, Inc.: 21 as claimant, 0 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

21 cases on record

Cases on record
21
As claimant
21
As respondent
0
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
G06F3/12 · H04L29/08 · H04N1/44 · H04N1/32 · G06F3/0481 · H04W76/14 · G06Q20/10 · H04N1/00 · G06K15/02 · H04W4/80 · H04W12/06 · H04W12/08 · H04W76/10 · G06K15/00 · G06F15/16 · H04W64/00 · G06F3/0488 · G06F3/0482 · H04B7/00 · H04L12/28
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
2:25-cv-00960 Flexiworld Technologies, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 18 Sep 2025 250 d Dismissed with Prejudice
4:24-cv-02691 Flexiworld Technologies, Inc. v. Hewlett-Parkard, Co. Plaintiff S.D. Tex. 19 Jul 2024 678 d Case Dismissed
2:23-cv-00616 Flexiworld Technologies, Inc. v. Sony, Corp. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 19 Dec 2023 527 d Dismissed with Prejudice
6:23-cv-06370 Flexiworld Technologies, Inc. v. Xerox, Corp. Plaintiff W.D.N.Y. 29 Jun 2023 327 d Dismissed with Prejudice
6:23-cv-06371 Flexiworld Technologies, Inc. v. Xerox, Corp. Plaintiff W.D.N.Y. 29 Jun 2023 327 d Dismissed with Prejudice
6:23-cv-06372 Flexiworld Technologies, Inc. v. Xerox, Corp. Plaintiff W.D.N.Y. 29 Jun 2023 327 d Dismissed with Prejudice
6:23-cv-06373 Flexiworld Technologies, Inc. v. Xerox, Corp. Plaintiff W.D.N.Y. 29 Jun 2023 327 d Dismissed with Prejudice
1:22-cv-04371 Flexiworld Technologies, Inc. v. Hisense Company, Ltd. Plaintiff N.D. Ga. 2 Nov 2022 156 d Case Settled
1:22-cv-04338 Flexiworld Technologies, Inc. v. Hisense Company, Ltd. Plaintiff N.D. Ga. 31 Oct 2022 158 d Case Settled
2:22-cv-00225 Flexiworld Technologies, Inc. v. Hisense Co., Ltd. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 24 Jun 2022 129 d Case Transferred
2:22-cv-00227 Flexiworld Technologies, Inc. v. Hisense Co., Ltd. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 24 Jun 2022 129 d Case Transferred
2:22-cv-02251 Flexiworld Technologies, Inc. v. Brother Industries (USA), Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tenn. 21 Apr 2022 326 d Consent Judgment
2:22-cv-02236 Flexiworld Technologies, Inc. v. Brother Industries, Ltd. Plaintiff W.D. Tenn. 15 Apr 2022 332 d Consent Judgment
2:22-cv-02237 Flexiworld Technologies, Inc. v. Brothers Industries (U.S.A), Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tenn. 15 Apr 2022 332 d Consent Judgment
5:22-cv-00097 Flexiworld Technologies, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Ky. 14 Apr 2022 784 d Dismissed with Prejudice
6:21-cv-00767 Flexiworld Technologies, Inc. v. Roku, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 27 Jul 2021 461 d Case Dismissed
6:21-cv-00680 Flexiworld Technologies, Inc. v. Roku, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 28 Jun 2021 487 d Case Dismissed
8:21-cv-00807 Flexiworld Technologies, Inc. v. Epson America, Inc. Plaintiff C.D. Cal. 29 Apr 2021 278 d Out-of-court Settlement
6:21-cv-00143 Flexiworld Technologies, Inc. v. Canon, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 11 Feb 2021 196 d Voluntary dismissal
6:20-cv-00819 Flexiworld Technologies, Inc. v. Roku, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 8 Sep 2020 780 d Case Dismissed
6:20-cv-00553 Flexiworld Technologies, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 22 Jun 2020 406 d Case Transferred
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Flexiworld Technologies, Inc. in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Flexiworld Technologies is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.