Frequency Systems, LLC Patent litigation record

Company 26 cases

26 cases on record naming Frequency Systems, LLC: 26 as claimant, 0 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

26 cases on record

Cases on record
26
As claimant
26
As respondent
0
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
H04B7/00
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
2:15-cv-00681 Frequency Systems, LLC v. Adtran, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 8 May 2015 221 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-00682 Frequency Systems, LLC v. TCL Communication Technology Holdings Limited Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 8 May 2015 221 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-00683 Frequency Systems, LLC v. Amped Wireless Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 8 May 2015 164 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-00684 Frequency Systems, LLC v. Asustek Computer, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 8 May 2015 278 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-00685 Frequency Systems, LLC v. Belkin International, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 8 May 2015 63 d Voluntary dismissal
2:15-cv-00686 Frequency Systems, LLC v. Buffalo, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 8 May 2015 94 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-00687 Frequency Systems, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 8 May 2015 82 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-00688 Frequency Systems, LLC v. D-Link Systems, Incorporated Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 8 May 2015 154 d Out-of-court Settlement
2:15-cv-00689 Frequency Systems, LLC v. Engenius Technologies, Inc Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 8 May 2015 221 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-00690 Frequency Systems, LLC v. Extreme Networks, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 8 May 2015 76 d Out-of-court Settlement
2:15-cv-00691 Frequency Systems, LLC v. Hewlett-Packard Company Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 8 May 2015 45 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-00692 Frequency Systems, LLC v. HTC Corporation Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 8 May 2015 84 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-00693 Frequency Systems, LLC v. Huawei Technologies USA, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 8 May 2015 84 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-00694 Frequency Systems, LLC v. Iogear, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 8 May 2015 154 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-00695 Frequency Systems, LLC v. Kyocera International, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 8 May 2015 171 d Out-of-court Settlement
2:15-cv-00696 Frequency Systems, LLC v. LG Electronics, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 8 May 2015 97 d Out-of-court Settlement
2:15-cv-00697 Frequency Systems, LLC v. Linksys International, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 8 May 2015 117 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-00698 Frequency Systems, LLC v. Motorola Mobility, LLC Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 8 May 2015 125 d Out-of-court Settlement
2:15-cv-00699 Frequency Systems, LLC v. Netgear, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 8 May 2015 221 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-00700 Frequency Systems, LLC v. Novatel Wireless, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 8 May 2015 145 d Out-of-court Settlement
2:15-cv-00701 Frequency Systems, LLC v. Sharp Electronics Corporation Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 8 May 2015 89 d Out-of-court Settlement
2:15-cv-00702 Frequency Systems, LLC v. TP-Link USA Corporation Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 8 May 2015 221 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-00703 Frequency Systems, LLC v. Trendnet, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 8 May 2015 278 d Out-of-court Settlement
2:15-cv-00704 Frequency Systems, LLC v. Western Digital Technologies, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 8 May 2015 116 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-00705 Frequency Systems, LLC v. ZTE USA, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 8 May 2015 80 d Out-of-court Settlement
2:15-cv-00706 Frequency Systems, LLC v. Zyxel Communications, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 8 May 2015 278 d Out-of-court Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Frequency Systems, LLC in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Frequency Systems is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.