FrontPoint Security Solutions, LLC Patent litigation record

Company 16 cases

16 cases on record naming FrontPoint Security Solutions, LLC: 0 as claimant, 16 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

16 cases on record

Cases on record
16
As claimant
0
As respondent
16
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
Not recorded
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
1:25-cv-00719 e-Beacon LLC v. FrontPoint Security Solutions, LLC Defendant E.D. Va. 26 Apr 2025 27 d Dismissed with Prejudice
1:21-cv-01052 Cedar Lane Technologies, Inc. v. FrontPoint Security Solutions, LLC Defendant E.D. Va. 15 Sep 2021 0 d Case Transferred
2:21-cv-00513 Cedar Lane Technologies, Inc. v. FrontPoint Security Solutions, LLC Defendant E.D. Va. 15 Sep 2021 6 d Voluntary dismissal
1:21-cv-00402 Aperture IP, LLC v. FrontPoint Security Solutions, LLC Defendant E.D. Va. 1 Apr 2021 131 d Voluntary dismissal
1:21-cv-00447 Mellaconic IP, LLC v. FrontPoint Security Solutions, LLC Defendant D. Del. 26 Mar 2021 67 d Voluntary dismissal
1:19-cv-01267 Wireless Communications Mobile, LLC v. FrontPoint Security Solutions, LLC Defendant E.D. Va. 2 Oct 2019 167 d Voluntary dismissal
1:19-cv-01395 Pebble Tide, LLC v. FrontPoint Security Solutions, LLC Defendant D. Del. 27 Jul 2019 193 d Voluntary dismissal
1:18-cv-01309 Karamelion, LLC v. FrontPoint Security Solutions, LLC Defendant D. Del. 23 Aug 2018 106 d Voluntary dismissal
3:18-cv-00590 Sipco, LLC v. FrontPoint Security Solutions, LLC Defendant E.D. Va. 23 Aug 2018 228 d Likely Settlement
1:18-cv-00187 Rothschild Broadcast Distribution Systems, LLC v. FrontPoint Security Solutions, LLC Defendant D. Del. 31 Jan 2018 240 d Likely Settlement
1:17-cv-01601 Tenaha Licensing, LLC v. FrontPoint Security Solutions, LLC Defendant D. Del. 7 Nov 2017 188 d Voluntary dismissal
2:16-cv-01239 Wireless Monitoring Systems, LLC v. FrontPoint Security Solutions, LLC Defendant E.D. Tex. 7 Nov 2016 112 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-00414 Clean Energy Management Solutions, LLC v. FrontPoint Security Solutions, LLC Defendant E.D. Tex. 15 Apr 2016 227 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-00089 Entry Systems, LLC v. FrontPoint Security Solutions, LLC Defendant E.D. Tex. 27 Jan 2016 376 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-01430 Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations, LLC v. FrontPoint Security Solutions, LLC Defendant E.D. Tex. 21 Aug 2015 41 d Voluntary dismissal
2:15-cv-00374 Script Security Solutions, LLC v. FrontPoint Security Solutions, LLC Defendant E.D. Tex. 13 Mar 2015 459 d Likely Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming FrontPoint Security Solutions, LLC in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what FrontPoint Security Solutions is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.