Groupon, Inc. Patent litigation record

Company 26 cases

26 cases on record naming Groupon, Inc.: 1 as claimant, 25 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

26 cases on record

Cases on record
26
As claimant
1
As respondent
25
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
Not recorded
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
1:24-cv-13143 DataCloud Technologies, LLC v. Groupon, Inc. Defendant N.D. Ill. 20 Dec 2024 314 d Voluntary dismissal
23-1359 Kroy IP Holdings, LLC v. Groupon, Inc Defendant Fed. Cir. 10 Jan 2023 762 d Reversed and Remanded
1:19-cv-03754 Honeyman Cipher Solutions, LLC v. Groupon, Inc. Defendant N.D. Ill. 5 Jun 2019 224 d Voluntary dismissal
1:18-cv-07277 Sapphire Crossing, LLC v. Groupon, Inc. Defendant N.D. Ill. 31 Oct 2018 71 d Voluntary dismissal
1:17-cv-08950 Paint Zoom, LLC v. Groupon, Inc. Defendant N.D. Ill. 13 Dec 2017 55 d Voluntary dismissal
1:17-cv-01405 Kroy IP Holdings, LLC v. Groupon, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 6 Oct 2017 1886 d Case Dismissed
2:17-cv-06790 Paint Zoom, LLC v. Groupon, Inc. Defendant C.D. Cal. 14 Sep 2017 145 d Voluntary dismissal
6:16-cv-01385 Aeritas, LLC v. Groupon, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 21 Dec 2016 97 d Voluntary dismissal
5:16-cv-00173 Venadium, LLC v. Groupon, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 17 Nov 2016 90 d Voluntary dismissal
2:16-cv-01093 Plano Encryption Technologies, LLC v. Groupon, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 4 Oct 2016 248 d Procedural Outcome
2:16-cv-00844 Autumn Cloud, LLC v. Groupon, LLC Defendant E.D. Tex. 2 Aug 2016 23 d Voluntary dismissal
1:16-cv-05064 Groupon, Inc. v. International Business Machines Corporation Plaintiff N.D. Ill. 9 May 2016 875 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-00212 Guyzar, LLC v. Groupon, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 14 Mar 2016 129 d Likely Settlement
1:16-cv-00122 International Business Machines, Corp. v. Groupon, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 2 Mar 2016 944 d Likely Settlement
6:15-cv-01101 Encoditech, LLC v. Groupon, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 30 Nov 2015 170 d Voluntary dismissal
2016-1194 Evolutionary Intelligence, LLC v. Groupon, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 10 Nov 2015 185 d Closed
2:15-cv-01735 CryptoPeak Solutions, LLC v. Groupon, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 9 Nov 2015 259 d Out-of-court Settlement
2:15-cv-01689 Location Services IP, LLC v. Groupon, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 29 Oct 2015 144 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-00607 eDekka, LLC v. Groupon, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 1 May 2015 12 d Voluntary dismissal
6:14-cv-00706 SFA Systems, LLC v. Groupon, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 18 Aug 2014 338 d Likely Settlement
6:14-cv-00116 Qommerce Systems, LLC v. Groupon, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 17 Feb 2014 388 d Likely Settlement
4:13-cv-04204 Evolutionary Intelligence, LLC v. Groupon, Inc. Defendant N.D. Cal. 11 Sep 2013 756 d Other
5:13-cv-04204 Evolutionary Intelligence, LLC v. Groupon, Inc. Defendant N.D. Cal. 11 Sep 2013 756 d Closed
2:12-cv-02781 B.E. Technology, LLC v. Groupon, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tenn. 10 Sep 2012 1927 d Likely Settlement
6:12-cv-00486 Blue Calypso, Inc. v. Groupon, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 31 Jul 2012 1478 d Likely Settlement
6:15-cv-00664 Blue Calypso, Inc. v. Groupon, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 31 Jul 2012 1728 d Likely Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Groupon, Inc. in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Groupon is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.