Hologic, Inc. Patent litigation record

Company 25 cases

25 cases on record naming Hologic, Inc.: 8 as claimant, 17 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

25 cases on record

Cases on record
25
As claimant
8
As respondent
17
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
A61B18/00 · A61B19/00 · A61B17/00 · A61B5/107 · A61B18/14 · A61M16/04 · A61B18/18 · A61B18/12 · A61F6/14 · A61F6/18 · A61B5/05 · A61B6/00 · A61B6/04 · G21K1/00
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
1:24-cv-10746 Endobotics, LLC v. Hologic, Inc. Defendant D. Mass. 22 Mar 2024 200 d Case Settled
20-631 Hologic, Inc. v. Minerva Surgical, Inc. Plaintiff U.S. Supreme Court 10 Nov 2020 62 d Appeal Denied
1:20-cv-00925 Hologic, Inc. v. Minerva Surgical, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 8 Jul 2020 1030 d Consent Judgment
2019-2081 Hologic, Inc. v. Minerva Surgical, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 2 Jul 2019 295 d Closed
2019-2054 Hologic, Inc. v. Minerva Surgical, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 21 Jun 2019 306 d Closed
2019-1244 Enzo Life Sciences, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 3 Dec 2018 143 d Closed
1:18-cv-00343 Fujifilm Corporation v. Hologic, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 2 Mar 2018 333 d Likely Settlement
2018-1550 Hologic, Inc. v. Minerva Surgical, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 12 Feb 2018 431 d Closed
1:18-cv-00217 Minerva Surgical, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 7 Feb 2018 1262 d Judgment on the Merits
1:18-cv-00021 Biomerieux, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 3 Jan 2018 835 d Judgment on the Merits
2018-1232 Enzo Life Sciences, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 30 Nov 2017 624 d Closed
2018-1233 Enzo Life Sciences, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 30 Nov 2017 624 d Closed
337-TA-1063 Hologic, Inc. v. Fujifilm Corporation Plaintiff United States International Trade Commission 1 Aug 2017 560 d Closed
2017-2355 Enzo Life Sciences, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 31 Jul 2017 634 d Closed
3:17-cv-01056 Hologic, Inc. v. FUJIFILM Med Sys USA, Inc. Plaintiff D. Conn. 26 Jun 2017 584 d Voluntary dismissal
3:17-cv-02013 Minerva Surgical, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc. Defendant N.D. Cal. 11 Apr 2017 297 d Case Transferred
1:17-cv-00102 Biomerieux, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc. Defendant M.D.N.C. 3 Feb 2017 334 d Case Transferred
1:16-cv-00894 Enzo Life Sciences, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 3 Oct 2016 763 d Judgment on the Merits
3:16-cv-02703 Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc. Defendant N.D. Cal. 18 May 2016 135 d Other
1:15-cv-01031 Hologic, Inc. v. Minerva Surgical, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 6 Nov 2015 1305 d Judgment on the Merits
8:15-cv-01624 Surgical Irrigation Technologies, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc. Defendant C.D. Cal. 8 Oct 2015 137 d Likely Settlement
1:15-cv-00271 Enzo Life Sciences, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 27 Mar 2015 1490 d Voluntary dismissal
1:15-cv-00082 B Therapy LLC v. Hologic, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 26 Jan 2015 87 d Likely Settlement
1:12-cv-00276 Enzo Life Sciences, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 6 Mar 2012 1961 d Judgment on the Merits
1:11-cv-12064 Smith & Nephew, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc. Defendant D. Mass. 22 Nov 2011 2533 d Likely Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Hologic, Inc. in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Hologic is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.