Innovation Sciences, LLC Patent litigation record

Company 19 cases

19 cases on record naming Innovation Sciences, LLC: 18 as claimant, 1 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

19 cases on record

Cases on record
19
As claimant
18
As respondent
1
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
H04L25/20 · H04N21/41 · H04W28/06 · H04W4/029 · H04N21/436 · H04N21/61 · H04N21/4363 · H04N21/438 · H04L12/66 · H04W4/02 · H04L29/08 · H04W24/08 · G09G5/00 · H04N19/70 · H04N19/40 · H04N21/414 · H04W84/04
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
9:26-cv-80678 Innovation Sciences LLC v. M2M Services, LTD Plaintiff S.D. Fla. 8 Jun 2026 46 d Voluntary dismissal
1:25-cv-00837 Innovation Sciences, LLC v. MGM Security Services, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 2 Jun 2025 203 d Case Transferred
1:25-cv-00620 Innovation Sciences LLC v. Cove Smart, LLC Plaintiff D. Del. 16 May 2025 395 d Dismissed with Prejudice
1:25-cv-00394 Innovation Sciences, LLC v. Xiaomi, Corp. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 14 Mar 2025 468 d Dismissed with Prejudice
6:25-cv-00013 Innovation Sciences, LLC v. Xiaomi, Corp. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 10 Jan 2025 63 d Voluntary dismissal
22-544 Innovation Sciences, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc. Plaintiff U.S. Supreme Court 12 Dec 2022 71 d Petition Dismissed
2021-2132 Innovation Sciences, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 12 Jul 2021 240 d Closed
2021-2111 Innovation Sciences, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 1 Jul 2021 384 d Closed
2020-1639 Innovation Sciences, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 1 Apr 2020 279 d Closed
1:19-cv-01620 HTC Corporation v. Innovation Sciences, LLC Defendant E.D. Va. 26 Dec 2019 70 d Case Transferred
4:19-cv-00771 Innovation Sciences, LLC v. Resideo Technologies, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 19 Oct 2019 37 d Voluntary dismissal
4:19-cv-00769 Innovation Sciences, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 18 Oct 2019 45 d Voluntary dismissal
4:19-cv-00770 Innovation Sciences, LLC v. HTC Corporation Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 18 Oct 2019 45 d Voluntary dismissal
337-TA-1180 Innovation Sciences, LLC v. HTC America, Inc. Plaintiff United States International Trade Commission 17 Oct 2019 418 d Closed
4:18-cv-00474 Innovation Sciences, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 5 Jul 2018 967 d Procedural Outcome
4:18-cv-00475 Innovation Sciences, LLC v. Resideo Technologies, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 5 Jul 2018 813 d Likely Settlement
4:18-cv-00476 Innovation Sciences, LLC v. HTC Corporation Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 5 Jul 2018 865 d Likely Settlement
4:18-cv-00477 Innovation Sciences, LLC v. Vector Security, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 5 Jul 2018 593 d Voluntary dismissal
6:16-cv-02063 Innovation Sciences, LLC v. TEC Services Group, Inc Plaintiff N.D. Iowa 15 Jun 2016 482 d Likely Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Innovation Sciences, LLC in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Innovation Sciences is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.