Interface Linx, LLC | Patent Litigation Record

13 cases on record

Cases on record: 13
As claimant: 13
As respondent: 0
Patents held: Not recorded
Core tech: Not recorded

Case no.	Parties	Role	Court	Filed	Duration	Outcome
1:17-cv-01098	Interface Linx, LLC v. Haier America Company, LLC	Plaintiff	D. Del.	7 Aug 2017	280 d	Likely Settlement
1:17-cv-01099	Interface Linx, LLC v. Onkyo U.S.A., Corp.	Plaintiff	D. Del.	7 Aug 2017	520 d	Likely Settlement
1:17-cv-01100	Interface Linx, LLC v. Pioneer Electronics (USA), Inc.	Plaintiff	D. Del.	7 Aug 2017	443 d	Voluntary dismissal
1:17-cv-01101	Interface Linx, LLC v. Sherwood America, Inc.	Plaintiff	D. Del.	7 Aug 2017	602 d	Voluntary dismissal
1:17-cv-01102	Interface Linx, LLC v. Sound United, LLC	Plaintiff	D. Del.	7 Aug 2017	351 d	Likely Settlement
1:17-cv-01103	Interface Linx, LLC v. TTE Technology, Inc.	Plaintiff	D. Del.	7 Aug 2017	456 d	Voluntary dismissal
1:17-cv-01104	Interface Linx, LLC v. Voxx International, Corp.	Plaintiff	D. Del.	7 Aug 2017	682 d	Voluntary dismissal
2:17-cv-03170	Interface Linx, LLC v. Haier America Company, LLC	Plaintiff	C.D. Cal.	27 Apr 2017	126 d	Likely Settlement
2:17-cv-03176	Interface Linx, LLC v. Hisense USA Corp.	Plaintiff	C.D. Cal.	27 Apr 2017	1 d	Other
2:17-cv-03182	Interface Linx, LLC v. Hisense USA Corporation	Plaintiff	C.D. Cal.	27 Apr 2017	11 d	Case Transferred
2:17-cv-03188	Interface Linx, LLC v. Onkyo U.S.A. Corporation	Plaintiff	C.D. Cal.	27 Apr 2017	11 d	Case Transferred
2:17-cv-03191	Interface Linx, LLC v. Pioneer Electronics (USA), Inc.	Plaintiff	C.D. Cal.	27 Apr 2017	11 d	Case Transferred
2:17-cv-03192	Interface Linx, LLC v. Sherwood America, Inc.	Plaintiff	C.D. Cal.	27 Apr 2017	11 d	Case Transferred

Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Interface Linx, LLC in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Interface Linx, LLC Patent litigation record

13 cases on record

See what Interface Linx is protecting