Logitech, Inc. Patent litigation record

Company 26 cases

26 cases on record naming Logitech, Inc.: 0 as claimant, 26 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

26 cases on record

Cases on record
26
As claimant
0
As respondent
26
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
Not recorded
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
5:26-cv-02722 VoltStar Technologies, Inc. v. Logitech, S.A. Defendant N.D. Cal. 27 Mar 2026 118 d Voluntary dismissal
3:25-cv-05508 Gametronics, LLC v. Logitech, S.A. Defendant W.D. Wash. 10 Jun 2025 174 d Voluntary dismissal
1:23-cv-00487 Bandspeed, Inc. v. Logitech, S.A. Defendant W.D. Tex. 28 Apr 2023 250 d Voluntary dismissal
2:22-cv-00273 Cedar Lane Technologies, Inc. v. Logitech, Inc. Defendant W.D. Wash. 7 Mar 2022 185 d Voluntary dismissal
3:21-cv-05866 Creekview IP, LLC v. Logitech, Inc. Defendant W.D. Wash. 30 Nov 2021 252 d Voluntary dismissal
3:21-cv-04605 2bcom, LLC v. Logitech, Inc. Defendant N.D. Cal. 15 Jun 2021 213 d Voluntary dismissal
3:21-cv-05230 Aperture Net, LLC v. Logitech, Inc. Defendant W.D. Wash. 31 Mar 2021 226 d Voluntary dismissal
2:20-cv-09728 Terrestrial Comms, LLC v. Logitech, Inc. Defendant C.D. Cal. 22 Oct 2020 186 d Voluntary dismissal
4:20-cv-00105 Adiona IP, LLC v. Logitech, Inc. Defendant N.D. Cal. 3 Jan 2020 147 d Voluntary dismissal
5:19-cv-02641 rondevoo technologies, llc v. Logitech, Inc. Defendant N.D. Cal. 15 May 2019 47 d Voluntary dismissal
3:19-cv-02287 Pebble Tide, LLC v. Logitech, Inc. Defendant N.D. Cal. 26 Apr 2019 306 d Out-of-court Settlement
3:18-cv-04762 Magnacross, LLC v. Logitech, Inc. Defendant N.D. Cal. 7 Aug 2018 45 d Voluntary dismissal
5:18-cv-01304 Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Logitech, Inc. Defendant N.D. Cal. 28 Feb 2018 401 d Stayed
3:17-cv-06733 Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Logitech, Inc. Defendant N.D. Cal. 22 Nov 2017 211 d Likely Settlement
2:17-cv-00400 Rothschild Patent Imaging, LLC v. Logitech, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 9 May 2017 65 d Likely Settlement
6:17-cv-00152 Sookbox Development, LLC v. Logitech, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 10 Mar 2017 32 d Voluntary dismissal
2:16-cv-01400 Script Security Solutions, LLC v. Logitech, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 12 Dec 2016 365 d Likely Settlement
1:16-cv-08885 Iron Gate Security, Inc. v. Logitech, Inc. Defendant S.D.N.Y. 15 Nov 2016 65 d Out-of-court Settlement
6:16-cv-00948 Pico Byte Systems, LLC v. Logitech, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 29 Jun 2016 112 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-01598 Sockeye Licensing TX, LLC v. Logitech, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 5 Oct 2015 22 d Voluntary dismissal
8:15-cv-01407 Targus Group International, Inc. v. Logitech, Inc. Defendant C.D. Cal. 2 Sep 2015 161 d Likely Settlement
5:15-cv-00130 Venadium, LLC v. Logitech, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 16 Jul 2015 166 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-01162 Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations, LLC v. Logitech, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 24 Jun 2015 173 d Likely Settlement
1:14-cv-01568 Adaptive Data, LLC v. Logitech, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 31 Dec 2014 128 d Voluntary dismissal
2:14-cv-01173 Trover Group, Inc. v. Logitech, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 31 Dec 2014 120 d Likely Settlement
2:14-cv-01157 Better Mouse Company, LLC v. Logitech, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 18 Dec 2014 210 d Likely Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Logitech, Inc. in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Logitech, S.A. is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.