Logitraq, LLC Patent litigation record

Company 29 cases

29 cases on record naming Logitraq, LLC: 29 as claimant, 0 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

29 cases on record

Cases on record
29
As claimant
29
As respondent
0
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
Not recorded
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
6:15-cv-00443 Logitraq, LLC v. Con-way Freight, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 23 Apr 2015 46 d Likely Settlement
6:14-cv-00953 Logitraq, LLC v. ABF Freight System, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 18 Dec 2014 211 d Likely Settlement
6:14-cv-00954 Logitraq, LLC v. Acme Truck Line, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 18 Dec 2014 211 d Likely Settlement
6:14-cv-00955 Logitraq, LLC v. Amerigas Propane, LP Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 18 Dec 2014 159 d Likely Settlement
6:14-cv-00956 Logitraq, LLC v. Beacon Sales Acquisition, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 18 Dec 2014 188 d Likely Settlement
6:14-cv-00957 Logitraq, LLC v. Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 18 Dec 2014 130 d Likely Settlement
6:14-cv-00958 Logitraq, LLC v. Cemex, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 18 Dec 2014 123 d Likely Settlement
6:14-cv-00959 Logitraq, LLC v. Costco Wholesale, Corp. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 18 Dec 2014 70 d Likely Settlement
6:14-cv-00960 Logitraq, LLC v. Evans Delivery Company, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 18 Dec 2014 102 d Likely Settlement
6:14-cv-00961 Logitraq, LLC v. Gemini Motor Transport, LP Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 18 Dec 2014 161 d Likely Settlement
6:14-cv-00962 Logitraq, LLC v. Graebel Companies, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 18 Dec 2014 211 d Likely Settlement
6:14-cv-00963 Logitraq, LLC v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 18 Dec 2014 133 d Likely Settlement
6:14-cv-00964 Logitraq, LLC v. Helena Chemical Company Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 18 Dec 2014 145 d Likely Settlement
6:14-cv-00965 Logitraq, LLC v. J.R. Simplot Company Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 18 Dec 2014 102 d Likely Settlement
6:14-cv-00966 Logitraq, LLC v. Key Energy Services, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 18 Dec 2014 119 d Likely Settlement
6:14-cv-00967 Logitraq, LLC v. Knife River Corporation Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 18 Dec 2014 123 d Likely Settlement
6:14-cv-00968 Logitraq, LLC v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 18 Dec 2014 167 d Other
6:14-cv-00969 Logitraq, LLC v. Mohawk Carpet Transportation of Georgia, LLC Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 18 Dec 2014 159 d Likely Settlement
6:14-cv-00970 Logitraq, LLC v. Mondelez Global, LLC Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 18 Dec 2014 130 d Likely Settlement
6:14-cv-00971 Logitraq, LLC v. Nabors Completion & Production Services, Co. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 18 Dec 2014 133 d Likely Settlement
6:14-cv-00972 Logitraq, LLC v. SAIA Motor Freight Line, LLC Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 18 Dec 2014 172 d Likely Settlement
6:14-cv-00973 Logitraq, LLC v. Southern Wine & Spirits of America, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 18 Dec 2014 102 d Likely Settlement
6:14-cv-00974 Logitraq, LLC v. Suddath Van Lines, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 18 Dec 2014 211 d Likely Settlement
6:14-cv-00975 Logitraq, LLC v. Sunbelt Rentals, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 18 Dec 2014 101 d Likely Settlement
6:14-cv-00976 Logitraq, LLC v. Transport Corporation of America, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 18 Dec 2014 46 d Likely Settlement
6:14-cv-00977 Logitraq, LLC v. United Road Services, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 18 Dec 2014 189 d Likely Settlement
6:14-cv-00978 Logitraq, LLC v. United Van Lines, LLC Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 18 Dec 2014 211 d Likely Settlement
6:14-cv-00979 Logitraq, LLC v. Weatherford US, LP Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 18 Dec 2014 130 d Likely Settlement
6:14-cv-00980 Logitraq, LLC v. Wheaton Van Lines, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 18 Dec 2014 211 d Likely Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Logitraq, LLC in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Logitraq is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.