Long Corner Consumer Electronics, LLC Patent litigation record

Company 17 cases

17 cases on record naming Long Corner Consumer Electronics, LLC: 17 as claimant, 0 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

17 cases on record

Cases on record
17
As claimant
17
As respondent
0
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
Not recorded
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
2:15-cv-00511 Long Corner Consumer Electronics, LLC v. Blu Products, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 15 Apr 2015 250 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-00513 Long Corner Consumer Electronics, LLC v. Cellco Partnership, (dba Verizon Wireless) Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 15 Apr 2015 236 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-00514 Long Corner Consumer Electronics, LLC v. Datalogic ADC, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 15 Apr 2015 92 d Other
2:15-cv-00515 Long Corner Consumer Electronics, LLC v. Double Power Technology, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 15 Apr 2015 250 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-00516 Long Corner Consumer Electronics, LLC v. LeapFrog Enterprises, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 15 Apr 2015 99 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-00517 Long Corner Consumer Electronics, LLC v. Motion Computing, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 15 Apr 2015 54 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-00518 Long Corner Consumer Electronics, LLC v. MSI Computer, Corp. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 15 Apr 2015 187 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-00519 Long Corner Consumer Electronics, LLC v. Spectralink Corporation Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 15 Apr 2015 89 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-00521 Long Corner Consumer Electronics, LLC v. Trimble Navigation Limited Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 15 Apr 2015 92 d Other
2:15-cv-00522 Long Corner Consumer Electronics, LLC v. Unitech America, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 15 Apr 2015 76 d Likely Settlement
2:14-cv-00352 Long Corner Consumer Electronics, LLC v. Archos, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 15 Apr 2014 686 d Likely Settlement
2:14-cv-00356 Long Corner Consumer Electronics, LLC v. Mach Speed Technologies, LLC Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 15 Apr 2014 686 d Likely Settlement
2:14-cv-00357 Long Corner Consumer Electronics, LLC v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 15 Apr 2014 265 d Likely Settlement
2:14-cv-00360 Long Corner Consumer Electronics, LLC v. Techno Source USA, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 15 Apr 2014 686 d Likely Settlement
2:14-cv-00361 Long Corner Consumer Electronics, LLC v. Toshiba America, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 15 Apr 2014 531 d Likely Settlement
2:14-cv-00364 Long Corner Consumer Electronics, LLC v. ZTE (USA), Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 15 Apr 2014 336 d Other
2:13-cv-00998 Long Corner Consumer Electronics, LLC v. Acer America, Corp. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 26 Nov 2013 554 d Likely Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Long Corner Consumer Electronics, LLC in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Long Corner Consumer Electronics is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.