Lucio Development, LLC Patent litigation record

Company 23 cases

23 cases on record naming Lucio Development, LLC: 23 as claimant, 0 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

23 cases on record

Cases on record
23
As claimant
23
As respondent
0
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
Not recorded
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
1:19-cv-00661 Lucio Development, LLC v. Ambiq Micro, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 27 Jun 2019 95 d Voluntary dismissal
1:19-cv-00662 Lucio Development, LLC v. Nuvoton Technology Corporation of America Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 27 Jun 2019 81 d Voluntary dismissal
1:19-cv-00663 Lucio Development, LLC v. Renesas Electronics America, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 27 Jun 2019 19 d Voluntary dismissal
6:19-cv-00282 Lucio Development, LLC v. Ittiam Systems, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 27 Jun 2019 36 d Voluntary dismissal
6:19-cv-00283 Lucio Development, LLC v. Microsoft, Corp. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 27 Jun 2019 196 d Voluntary dismissal
1:19-cv-00076 Lucio Development, LLC v. Mellanox Technologies, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 31 Jan 2019 61 d Voluntary dismissal
1:19-cv-00077 Lucio Development, LLC v. Silicon Laboratories, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 31 Jan 2019 89 d Voluntary dismissal
3:19-cv-00255 Lucio Development, LLC v. Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. Plaintiff N.D. Tex. 31 Jan 2019 25 d Voluntary dismissal
3:19-cv-00256 Lucio Development, LLC v. Microchip Technology Incorporated Plaintiff N.D. Tex. 31 Jan 2019 28 d Voluntary dismissal
3:19-cv-00257 Lucio Development, LLC v. Texas Instruments Incorporated Plaintiff N.D. Tex. 31 Jan 2019 85 d Voluntary dismissal
6:19-cv-00033 Lucio Development, LLC v. Cadence Design Systems, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 31 Jan 2019 42 d Case Dismissed
6:19-cv-00034 Lucio Development, LLC v. Qorvo, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 31 Jan 2019 53 d Case Dismissed
6:19-cv-00035 Lucio Development, LLC v. Semtech Corporation Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 31 Jan 2019 28 d Voluntary dismissal
1:17-cv-01148 Lucio Development, LLC v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 11 Dec 2017 120 d Voluntary dismissal
1:17-cv-01149 Lucio Development, LLC v. Cirrus Logic, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 11 Dec 2017 99 d Likely Settlement
1:17-cv-01150 Lucio Development, LLC v. Cypress Semiconductor Corporation Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 11 Dec 2017 49 d Voluntary dismissal
1:17-cv-01152 Lucio Development, LLC v. Infineon Technologies Americas, Corp. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 11 Dec 2017 113 d Voluntary dismissal
1:17-cv-01153 Lucio Development, LLC v. MediaTek USA, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 11 Dec 2017 120 d Voluntary dismissal
1:17-cv-01154 Lucio Development, LLC v. nVidia Corporation Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 11 Dec 2017 37 d Voluntary dismissal
1:17-cv-01155 Lucio Development, LLC v. NXP Semiconductors USA, Inc. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 11 Dec 2017 115 d Voluntary dismissal
3:17-cv-03356 Lucio Development, LLC v. STMicroelectronics, Inc. Plaintiff N.D. Tex. 11 Dec 2017 137 d Likely Settlement
4:17-cv-03737 Lucio Development, LLC v. Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. Plaintiff S.D. Tex. 11 Dec 2017 120 d Voluntary dismissal
6:17-cv-00688 Lucio Development, LLC v. Xilinx, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 11 Dec 2017 77 d Procedural Outcome
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Lucio Development, LLC in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Lucio Development is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.