Manitto Technologies, LLC Patent litigation record

Company 21 cases

21 cases on record naming Manitto Technologies, LLC: 21 as claimant, 0 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

21 cases on record

Cases on record
21
As claimant
21
As respondent
0
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
Not recorded
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
2:15-cv-01989 Manitto Technologies, LLC v. Alpine Electronics of America, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 30 Nov 2015 23 d Out-of-court Settlement
2:15-cv-01990 Manitto Technologies, LLC v. Clarion Corporation of America Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 30 Nov 2015 23 d Out-of-court Settlement
2:15-cv-01991 Manitto Technologies, LLC v. Fujitsu Ten Corp. of America, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 30 Nov 2015 23 d Out-of-court Settlement
2:15-cv-01992 Manitto Technologies, LLC v. General Motors Company Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 30 Nov 2015 199 d Judgment on the Merits
2:15-cv-01993 Manitto Technologies, LLC v. Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 30 Nov 2015 199 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-01994 Manitto Technologies, LLC v. JVCKenwood USA Corporation Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 30 Nov 2015 23 d Out-of-court Settlement
2:15-cv-01995 Manitto Technologies, LLC v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 30 Nov 2015 168 d Likely Settlement
2:15-cv-01996 Manitto Technologies, LLC v. Paccar, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 30 Nov 2015 88 d Out-of-court Settlement
2:15-cv-01997 Manitto Technologies, LLC v. Pioneer Electronics (USA), Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 30 Nov 2015 23 d Out-of-court Settlement
2:15-cv-01998 Manitto Technologies, LLC v. Pyle Audio, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 30 Nov 2015 178 d Likely Settlement
2:14-cv-01109 Manitto Technologies, LLC v. Fca U.S., LLC Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 12 Dec 2014 531 d Likely Settlement
2:14-cv-01110 Manitto Technologies, LLC v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 12 Dec 2014 320 d Likely Settlement
2:14-cv-01111 Manitto Technologies, LLC v. Hyundai Motor America Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 12 Dec 2014 297 d Likely Settlement
2:14-cv-01112 Manitto Technologies, LLC v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 12 Dec 2014 382 d Likely Settlement
2:14-cv-01113 Manitto Technologies, LLC v. KIA Motors America, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 12 Dec 2014 297 d Likely Settlement
2:14-cv-01114 Manitto Technologies, LLC v. Nissan North America, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 12 Dec 2014 434 d Likely Settlement
2:14-cv-01115 Manitto Technologies, LLC v. Subaru of America, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 12 Dec 2014 382 d Likely Settlement
2:14-cv-01116 Manitto Technologies, LLC v. Toyota Motor Corporation Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 12 Dec 2014 318 d Likely Settlement
2:14-cv-01117 Manitto Technologies, LLC v. Volvo Cars of North America, LLC Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 12 Dec 2014 395 d Out-of-court Settlement
2:14-cv-01105 Manitto Technologies, LLC v. Ferrari North America, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 11 Dec 2014 532 d Likely Settlement
2:14-cv-01106 Manitto Technologies, LLC v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 11 Dec 2014 375 d Out-of-court Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Manitto Technologies, LLC in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Manitto Technologies is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.