Marking Object Virtualization Intelligence, LLC Patent litigation record

Company 17 cases

17 cases on record naming Marking Object Virtualization Intelligence, LLC: 17 as claimant, 0 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

17 cases on record

Cases on record
17
As claimant
17
As respondent
0
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
G06T1/00 · H04N7/26 · H04N19/60 · H04N1/32 · H04N7/167 · G06F12/14 · G06F1/00 · G06F21/00 · G06F15/16 · G06F9/44 · G06F9/46 · G06F21/12 · G06F21/33 · G06F7/04 · B41K3/38
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
2:16-cv-01113 Marking Object Virtualization Intelligence, LLC v. STMicroelectronics, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 7 Oct 2016 96 d Voluntary dismissal
2:16-cv-01115 Marking Object Virtualization Intelligence, LLC v. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 7 Oct 2016 110 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-01100 Marking Object Virtualization Intelligence, LLC v. Sonus Networks, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 6 Oct 2016 119 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-01103 Marking Object Virtualization Intelligence, LLC v. NEC Corporation Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 6 Oct 2016 92 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-01109 Marking Object Virtualization Intelligence, LLC v. Xilinx, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 6 Oct 2016 95 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-01097 Marking Object Virtualization Intelligence, LLC v. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 5 Oct 2016 96 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-01099 Marking Object Virtualization Intelligence, LLC v. Kudelski, S.A. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 5 Oct 2016 93 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-01066 Marking Object Virtualization Intelligence, LLC v. Dell, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 30 Sep 2016 117 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-01061 Marking Object Virtualization Intelligence, LLC v. Koninkl Philips Electronics, NV Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 29 Sep 2016 103 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-01062 Marking Object Virtualization Intelligence, LLC v. First Data Corporation Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 29 Sep 2016 222 d Out-of-court Settlement
2:16-cv-01055 Marking Object Virtualization Intelligence, LLC v. Hitachi, Ltd. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 28 Sep 2016 436 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-01056 Marking Object Virtualization Intelligence, LLC v. Symantec Corporation Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 28 Sep 2016 118 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-01046 Marking Object Virtualization Intelligence, LLC v. Fujitsu, Ltd. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 23 Sep 2016 160 d Out-of-court Settlement
2:16-cv-01045 Marking Object Virtualization Intelligence, LLC v. Arris Group, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 22 Sep 2016 106 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-01038 Marking Object Virtualization Intelligence, LLC v. Barracuda Networks, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 21 Sep 2016 230 d Out-of-court Settlement
2:16-cv-01040 Marking Object Virtualization Intelligence, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 21 Sep 2016 106 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-01042 Marking Object Virtualization Intelligence, LLC v. Arista Networks, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 21 Sep 2016 107 d Likely Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Marking Object Virtualization Intelligence, LLC in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Marking Object Virtualization Intelligence is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.