Mediatek, Inc. Patent litigation record

Company 45 cases

45 cases on record naming Mediatek, Inc.: 4 as claimant, 41 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

45 cases on record

Cases on record
45
As claimant
4
As respondent
41
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
H04L1/00 · H04L27/26 · H04L27/00 · H04W84/12 · H04L27/32 · H04W28/10 · H04W28/02
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
3:25-xc-02677 GenghisComm Holdings LLC v. Mediatek, Inc. Defendant N.D. Tex. 1 Oct 2025 0 d Case Terminated
4:25-cv-00425 Freedom Patents, LLC v. Mediatek, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 24 Apr 2025 210 d Dismissed with Prejudice
2:24-cv-00760 ServStor Technologies, LLC v. Mediatek, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 19 Sep 2024 145 d Dismissed with Prejudice
2:24-cv-00701 CommWorks Solutions, LLC v. Mediatek, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 27 Aug 2024 108 d Voluntary dismissal
7:24-cv-00187 Vdpp, LLC v. Mediatek, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 2 Aug 2024 172 d Voluntary dismissal
2:24-cv-00235 Daedalus Prime, LLC v. Mediatek, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 8 Apr 2024 409 d Dismissed with Prejudice
7:24-cv-00029 Redstone Logics, LLC v. Mediatek, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 26 Jan 2024 497 d Case Dismissed
6:24-cv-00023 Led Apogee, LLC v. Mediatek, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 16 Jan 2024 93 d Voluntary dismissal
6:23-cv-00844 Gamehancement, LLC v. Mediatek, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 9 Dec 2023 3 d Dismissed without Prejudice
2:23-cv-00429 Deepwell IP, LLC v. Mediatek, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 19 Sep 2023 283 d Dismissed with Prejudice
2:23-cv-00129 MOSAID Technologies, Inc. v. Mediatek, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 28 Mar 2023 645 d Dismissed with Prejudice
6:22-cv-01029 Cedar Lane Technologies, Inc. v. Mediatek, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 4 Oct 2022 360 d Voluntary dismissal
22-2101 Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation v. Mediatek, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 4 Aug 2022 491 d Appeal Dismissed
337-TA-1287 NXP Semiconductors, N.V. v. Mediatek, Inc. Defendant United States International Trade Commission 7 Dec 2021 230 d Closed
8:21-cv-01810 NXP USA, Inc. v. Mediatek, Inc. Defendant C.D. Cal. 1 Nov 2021 84 d Stayed
2:21-cv-00318 NXP U.S.A, Inc. v. Mediatek, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 24 Aug 2021 260 d Case Dismissed
2:21-cv-04969 Mediatek, Inc. v. NXP Semiconductors, N.V. Plaintiff C.D. Cal. 17 Jun 2021 399 d Likely Settlement
2:21-cv-04970 Mediatek, Inc. v. NXP Semiconductors, N.V. Plaintiff C.D. Cal. 17 Jun 2021 403 d Voluntary dismissal
2:21-cv-00189 Continental Circuits, LLC v. Mediatek, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 28 May 2021 196 d Voluntary dismissal
2:21-cv-00098 Elite Gaming Tech, LLC v. Mediatek, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 18 Mar 2021 159 d Voluntary dismissal
1:20-cv-01246 Koninklijke Philips v. Mediatek, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 17 Sep 2020 1782 d Judgment on the merits for Defendant
6:20-cv-00444 CDN Innovations, LLC v. Mediatek, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 29 May 2020 118 d Voluntary dismissal
1:20-cv-00632 Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation v. Mediatek, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 25 Mar 2020 832 d Likely Settlement
6:20-cv-00225 Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation v. Mediatek, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 25 Mar 2020 85 d Case Transferred
2019-2091 ATI Technologies, ULC v. MediaTek, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 3 Jul 2019 336 d Closed
2019-2092 ATI Technologies, ULC v. MediaTek, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 3 Jul 2019 336 d Closed
2019-2093 ATI Technologies, ULC v. MediaTek, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 3 Jul 2019 336 d Closed
2019-2094 ATI Technologies, ULC v. MediaTek, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 3 Jul 2019 336 d Closed
2:19-cv-00141 M-Red, Inc. v. Mediatek, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 29 Apr 2019 493 d Voluntary dismissal
1:19-cv-00368 Mediatek, Inc. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 21 Feb 2019 215 d Voluntary dismissal
1:19-cv-00304 Innovative Foundry Technologies, LLC v. Mediatek, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 13 Feb 2019 253 d Voluntary dismissal
1:19-cv-00070 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Mediatek, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 10 Jan 2019 256 d Voluntary dismissal
2019-1362 MediaTek, Inc. v. International Trade Commission Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 3 Jan 2019 265 d Closed
1:18-cv-01906 Dynamic Data Technologies, LLC v. Mediatek, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 30 Nov 2018 223 d Voluntary dismissal
6:18-cv-00339 American Patents, LLC v. MediaTek, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 14 Nov 2018 390 d Likely Settlement
3:17-cv-04232 Wireless Switch IP, LLC v. MediaTek, Inc. Defendant N.D. Cal. 25 Jul 2017 72 d Out-of-court Settlement
1:17-cv-00554 Wi-Lan, Inc. v. MediaTek, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 11 May 2017 99 d Likely Settlement
8:17-cv-00405 Broadcom Corporation v. Mediatek, Inc. Defendant C.D. Cal. 7 Mar 2017 71 d Stayed
2:16-cv-01421 ZiiLabs Inc., Ltd. v. MediaTek, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 16 Dec 2016 237 d Out-of-court Settlement
2:16-cv-00435 Mariner IC, Inc. v. Mediatek, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 25 Apr 2016 387 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-00438 Semcon IP, Inc. v. MediaTek, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 25 Apr 2016 723 d Likely Settlement
6:15-cv-00037 Azure Networks, LLC v. Mediatek, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 13 Jan 2015 223 d Out-of-court Settlement
1:14-cv-00435 Bandspeed, Inc. v. Mediatek, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 9 May 2014 466 d Likely Settlement
1:13-cv-01527 Optical Devices, LLC v. MediaTek, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 3 Sep 2013 1548 d Out-of-court Settlement
6:12-cv-00578 Commonwealth Scientific & Industrial Research Organisation v. Mediatek, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 27 Aug 2012 1298 d Likely Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Mediatek, Inc. in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Mediatek is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.