Memory Integrity, LLC Patent litigation record

Company 24 cases

24 cases on record naming Memory Integrity, LLC: 24 as claimant, 0 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

24 cases on record

Cases on record
24
As claimant
24
As respondent
0
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
Not recorded
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
2016-2544 Memory Integrity, LLC v. Sony Corporation Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 24 Aug 2016 138 d Closed
2016-2545 Memory Integrity, LLC v. Apple, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 24 Aug 2016 138 d Closed
2016-2546 Memory Integrity, LLC v. Sony Corporation Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 24 Aug 2016 138 d Closed
2016-2547 Memory Integrity, LLC v. Apple, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 24 Aug 2016 138 d Closed
2016-2426 Memory Integrity, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 4 Aug 2016 158 d Closed
3:15-cv-00262 Memory Integrity, LLC v. Intel Corporation Plaintiff D. Or. 13 Feb 2015 439 d Judgment on the Merits
1:13-cv-01983 Memory Integrity, LLC v. Hisense International Co., Ltd Plaintiff D. Del. 26 Nov 2013 1450 d Likely Settlement
1:13-cv-01984 Memory Integrity, LLC v. Microsoft Corporation Plaintiff D. Del. 26 Nov 2013 1119 d Likely Settlement
1:13-cv-01795 Memory Integrity, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 1 Nov 2013 1166 d Likely Settlement
1:13-cv-01796 Memory Integrity, LLC v. Apple, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 1 Nov 2013 1166 d Likely Settlement
1:13-cv-01797 Memory Integrity, LLC v. ASUSTek Computer, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 1 Nov 2013 1396 d Likely Settlement
1:13-cv-01798 Memory Integrity, LLC v. Blackberry Limited Plaintiff D. Del. 1 Nov 2013 1294 d Likely Settlement
1:13-cv-01799 Memory Integrity, LLC v. Fuhu, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 1 Nov 2013 1511 d Likely Settlement
1:13-cv-01800 Memory Integrity, LLC v. Fujitsu Limited Plaintiff D. Del. 1 Nov 2013 1252 d Likely Settlement
1:13-cv-01801 Memory Integrity, LLC v. Google, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 1 Nov 2013 1284 d Likely Settlement
1:13-cv-01802 Memory Integrity, LLC v. HTC Corporation Plaintiff D. Del. 1 Nov 2013 1166 d Likely Settlement
1:13-cv-01803 Memory Integrity, LLC v. Huawei Device USA, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 1 Nov 2013 1123 d Likely Settlement
1:13-cv-01804 Memory Integrity, LLC v. Intel Corporation Plaintiff D. Del. 1 Nov 2013 469 d Case Transferred
1:13-cv-01805 Memory Integrity, LLC v. Lenovo Group, Ltd. Plaintiff D. Del. 1 Nov 2013 1286 d Likely Settlement
1:13-cv-01806 Memory Integrity, LLC v. Lg Electronics, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 1 Nov 2013 1166 d Likely Settlement
1:13-cv-01807 Memory Integrity, LLC v. Motorola Solutions, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 1 Nov 2013 1286 d Likely Settlement
1:13-cv-01808 Memory Integrity, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd. Plaintiff D. Del. 1 Nov 2013 1166 d Likely Settlement
1:13-cv-01809 Memory Integrity, LLC v. Sony Corporation Plaintiff D. Del. 1 Nov 2013 1166 d Likely Settlement
1:13-cv-01810 Memory Integrity, LLC v. Toshiba Corporation Plaintiff D. Del. 1 Nov 2013 1321 d Likely Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Memory Integrity, LLC in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Memory Integrity is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.