Micro Design, LLC Patent litigation record

Company 21 cases

21 cases on record naming Micro Design, LLC: 21 as claimant, 0 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

21 cases on record

Cases on record
21
As claimant
21
As respondent
0
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
Not recorded
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
1:15-cv-00817 Micro Design, LLC v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Plaintiff D. Del. 15 Sep 2015 133 d Voluntary dismissal
1:15-cv-00821 Micro Design, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 15 Sep 2015 133 d Voluntary dismissal
1:15-cv-00744 Micro Design, LLC v. Apple, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 27 Aug 2015 147 d Voluntary dismissal
1:15-cv-00745 Micro Design, LLC v. Google, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 27 Aug 2015 147 d Voluntary dismissal
1:15-cv-00746 Micro Design, LLC v. Microsoft Corporation Plaintiff D. Del. 27 Aug 2015 147 d Voluntary dismissal
1:15-cv-00747 Micro Design, LLC v. Motorola Solutions, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 27 Aug 2015 6 d Voluntary dismissal
1:15-cv-00748 Micro Design, LLC v. Nokia USA, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 27 Aug 2015 147 d Voluntary dismissal
1:15-cv-00749 Micro Design, LLC v. Hewlett-Packard Company Plaintiff D. Del. 27 Aug 2015 147 d Voluntary dismissal
1:15-cv-00750 Micro Design, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 27 Aug 2015 147 d Voluntary dismissal
1:15-cv-00751 Micro Design, LLC v. LG Electronics USA, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 27 Aug 2015 147 d Voluntary dismissal
1:15-cv-00752 Micro Design, LLC v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 27 Aug 2015 147 d Voluntary dismissal
1:15-cv-00753 Micro Design, LLC v. HTC America, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 27 Aug 2015 147 d Voluntary dismissal
1:15-cv-00754 Micro Design, LLC v. Best Buy Co., Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 27 Aug 2015 147 d Voluntary dismissal
1:15-cv-00755 Micro Design, LLC v. Sony Electronics, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 27 Aug 2015 147 d Voluntary dismissal
1:14-cv-00835 Micro Design, LLC v. Acer America Corporation Plaintiff D. Del. 27 Jun 2014 318 d Likely Settlement
1:14-cv-00836 Micro Design, LLC v. Cray, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 27 Jun 2014 406 d Likely Settlement
1:14-cv-00837 Micro Design, LLC v. Asustek Computer, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 27 Jun 2014 406 d Likely Settlement
1:14-cv-00838 Micro Design, LLC v. Dell, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 27 Jun 2014 406 d Likely Settlement
1:14-cv-00839 Micro Design, LLC v. Fujitsu Limited Plaintiff D. Del. 27 Jun 2014 216 d Voluntary dismissal
1:14-cv-00840 Micro Design, LLC v. Lenovo (United States), Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 27 Jun 2014 406 d Likely Settlement
1:14-cv-00841 Micro Design, LLC v. NEC Corporation of America Plaintiff D. Del. 27 Jun 2014 313 d Likely Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Micro Design, LLC in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Micro Design is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.