Mobile Tech, Inc. Patent litigation record

Company 25 cases

25 cases on record naming Mobile Tech, Inc.: 6 as claimant, 19 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

25 cases on record

Cases on record
25
As claimant
6
As respondent
19
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
H04W56/00 · G06Q10/08 · H04L29/06 · H04W4/02 · G08B13/12 · G08B13/14 · G08B25/10 · G08B17/06
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
1:21-cv-06068 Mobile Tech, Inc. v. Sennco Solutions, Inc. Plaintiff N.D. Ill. 12 Nov 2021 112 d Voluntary dismissal
2020-1608 Mobile Tech, Inc. v. Sennco Solutions, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 26 Mar 2020 50 d Closed
2019-2408 InVue Security Products, Inc. v. Mobile Tech, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 18 Sep 2019 163 d Closed
2019-1937 Mobile Tech, Inc. v. Sennco Solutions, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 30 May 2019 326 d Closed
2019-1779 InVue Security Products, Inc. v. Mobile Tech, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 17 Apr 2019 100 d Closed
3:19-cv-00407 InVue Security Products, Inc. v. Mobile Tech, Inc. Defendant D. Or. 18 Mar 2019 506 d Voluntary dismissal
3:18-cv-01720 InVue Security Products, Inc. v. Mobile Tech, Inc. Defendant D. Or. 27 Sep 2018 678 d Voluntary dismissal
3:18-cv-00505 Mobile Tech, Inc. v. Invue Security Products, Inc. Plaintiff W.D.N.C. 17 Sep 2018 16 d Other
1:18-cv-02653 Invue Security Products, Inc. v. Mobile Tech, Inc. Defendant S.D. Ind. 28 Aug 2018 29 d Case Transferred
2018-2202 InVue Security Products, Inc. v. Mobile Tech, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 31 Jul 2018 346 d Closed
2018-1898 InVue Security Products, Inc. v. Mobile Tech, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 30 Apr 2018 312 d Closed
2018-1889 InVue Security Products, Inc. v. Mobile Tech, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 26 Apr 2018 316 d Closed
2018-1597 InVue Security Products, Inc. v. Mobile Tech, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 21 Feb 2018 380 d Closed
3:18-cv-00052 Mobile Tech, Inc. v. InVue Security Products, Inc. Plaintiff W.D.N.C. 30 Jan 2018 923 d Voluntary dismissal
2018-1304 InVue Security Products, Inc. v. Mobile Tech, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 18 Dec 2017 445 d Closed
2018-1236 InVue Security Products, Inc. v. Mobile Tech, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 30 Nov 2017 463 d Closed
2018-1238 InVue Security Products, Inc. v. Mobile Tech, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 30 Nov 2017 463 d Closed
2018-1239 InVue Security Products, Inc. v. Mobile Tech, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 30 Nov 2017 463 d Closed
2:17-cv-07491 Mobile Tech, Inc. v. InVue Security Products, Inc. Plaintiff C.D. Cal. 13 Oct 2017 109 d Case Transferred
3:17-cv-01356 InVue Security Products, Inc. v. Mobile Tech, Inc. Defendant D. Or. 30 Aug 2017 1071 d Voluntary dismissal
3:17-cv-00270 Invue Security Products, Inc. v. Mobile Tech, Inc. Defendant W.D.N.C. 23 May 2017 154 d Case Transferred
3:17-cv-00075 InVue Security Products, Inc. v. Mobile Tech, Inc. Defendant W.D.N.C. 21 Feb 2017 21 d Other
3:16-cv-00734 Invue Security Products, Inc. v. Mobile Tech, Inc. Defendant W.D.N.C. 25 Oct 2016 14 d Other
3:16-cv-00553 Invue Security Products, Inc. v. Mobile Tech, Inc. Defendant W.D.N.C. 19 Jul 2016 16 d Other
3:15-cv-00610 Invue Security Products, Inc. v. Mobile Tech, Inc. Defendant W.D.N.C. 15 Dec 2015 624 d Case Transferred
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Mobile Tech, Inc. in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Mobile Tech is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.