Netapp, Inc. Patent litigation record

Company 24 cases

24 cases on record naming Netapp, Inc.: 3 as claimant, 21 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

24 cases on record

Cases on record
24
As claimant
3
As respondent
21
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
Not recorded
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
1:24-cv-00985 WebSock Global Strategies, LLC v. NetApp, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 28 Aug 2024 16 d Dismissed with Prejudice
1:22-cv-01173 Focus Global Solutions, LLC v. NetApp, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 6 Sep 2022 104 d Voluntary dismissal
1:22-cv-02196 Tranquility IP, LLC v. NetApp, Inc. Defendant D. Colo. 26 Aug 2022 62 d Voluntary dismissal
1:21-cv-00960 Invincible IP, LLC v. Netapp, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 30 Jun 2021 163 d Voluntary dismissal
1:21-cv-00926 Digital Cache, LLC v. Netapp, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 29 Jun 2021 91 d Voluntary dismissal
2021-1351 KOM Software, Inc. v. Netapp, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 1 Dec 2020 381 d Closed
2021-1352 KOM Software, Inc. v. Netapp, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 1 Dec 2020 381 d Closed
2021-1353 KOM Software, Inc. v. Netapp, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 1 Dec 2020 381 d Closed
2021-1354 Netapp, Inc. v. KOM Software, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 1 Dec 2020 381 d Closed
2021-1181 KOM Software, Inc. v. Netapp, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 9 Nov 2020 403 d Closed
2021-1182 KOM Software, Inc. v. Netapp, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 9 Nov 2020 403 d Closed
2021-1100 KOM Software, Inc. v. Netapp, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 26 Oct 2020 416 d Closed
2021-1075 KOM Software, Inc. v. Netapp, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 21 Oct 2020 422 d Closed
2021-1076 Netapp, Inc. v. KOM Software, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 21 Oct 2020 422 d Closed
2021-1005 KOM Software, Inc. v. Netapp, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 2 Oct 2020 440 d Closed
2021-1006 Netapp, Inc. v. KOM Software, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 2 Oct 2020 440 d Closed
2020-2345 KOM Software, Inc. v. Netapp, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 30 Sep 2020 442 d Closed
2020-2346 KOM Software, Inc. v. Netapp, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 30 Sep 2020 442 d Closed
1:19-cv-00580 Blueprint IP Solutions, LLC v. Netapp, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 28 Mar 2019 125 d Voluntary dismissal
1:18-cv-00160 KOM Software, Inc. v. NetApp, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 29 Jan 2018 2389 d Voluntary dismissal
1:16-cv-10868 Intellectual Ventures I, LLC v. Netapp, Inc. Defendant D. Mass. 11 May 2016 460 d Other
2015-1103 Summit Data Systems, LLC v. Netapp, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 28 Oct 2014 346 d Closed
1:14-cv-00149 Crossroads Systems, Inc. v. Netapp, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 18 Feb 2014 1624 d Out-of-court Settlement
1:12-cv-01628 Safe Storage, LLC v. NetApp, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 30 Nov 2012 1609 d Likely Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Netapp, Inc. in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what NetApp is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.