Network-1 Technologies, Inc. Patent litigation record

Company 22 cases

22 cases on record naming Network-1 Technologies, Inc.: 16 as claimant, 6 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

22 cases on record

Cases on record
22
As claimant
16
As respondent
6
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
G06F17/30 · H04N7/173 · H04M1/72469 · G06Q30/02
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
24-1948 Network-1 Technologies, Inc. v. Google, LLC Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 14 Jun 2024 678 d Appeal Dismissed in Part
24-1893 Network-1 Technologies, Inc. v. Google, LLC Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 3 Jun 2024 689 d Appeal Dismissed in Part
8:22-cv-02087 Network 1 Technologies, Inc. v. Dahua Technology USA, Inc. Plaintiff C.D. Cal. 16 Nov 2022 380 d Case Stayed
8:22-cv-02039 Network-1 Technologies, Inc. v. Antaira Technologies, LLC Plaintiff C.D. Cal. 8 Nov 2022 107 d Consent Judgment
2:22-cv-00430 Network-1 Technologies, Inc. v. Panasonic Holdings Corporation Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 4 Nov 2022 157 d Appeal Dismissed
1:22-cv-01318 Network-1 Technologies, Inc. v. Arista Networks, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 6 Oct 2022 124 d Case Dismissed
1:22-cv-01319 Network-1 Technologies, Inc. v. Fortinet, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 6 Oct 2022 379 d Dismissed without Prejudice
1:22-cv-01320 Network-1 Technologies, Inc. v. Foxconn Technology Group Plaintiff D. Del. 6 Oct 2022 629 d Dismissed with Prejudice
1:22-cv-01321 Network-1 Technologies, Inc. v. Ubiquiti, Inc. Plaintiff D. Del. 6 Oct 2022 861 d Case Dismissed
2018-2395 Network-1 Technologies, Inc. v. Hewlett-Parkard, Co. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 20 Sep 2018 735 d Closed
2018-2396 Network-1 Technologies, Inc. v. Hewlett-Parkard, Co. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 20 Sep 2018 735 d Closed
2018-2338 Network-1 Technologies, Inc. v. Hewlett-Parkard, Co. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 5 Sep 2018 750 d Closed
2018-2339 Network-1 Technologies, Inc. v. Hewlett-Parkard, Co. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 5 Sep 2018 750 d Closed
2017-1379 Google, Inc. v. Network-1 Technologies, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 20 Dec 2016 399 d Closed
2016-2575 Google, Inc. v. Network-1 Technologies, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 29 Aug 2016 164 d Closed
2016-2509 Google, LLC v. Network-1 Technologies, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 19 Aug 2016 584 d Closed
2016-2510 Google, Inc. v. Network-1 Technologies, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 19 Aug 2016 584 d Closed
2016-2511 Google, Inc. v. Network-1 Technologies, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 19 Aug 2016 584 d Closed
2016-2512 Google, Inc. v. Network-1 Technologies, Inc. Defendant Fed. Cir. 19 Aug 2016 584 d Closed
1:14-cv-02396 Network-1 Technologies, Inc. v. Google L.L.C Plaintiff S.D.N.Y. 4 Apr 2014 3673 d Judgment on the merits for Defendant
6:13-cv-00072 Network-1 Technologies, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 17 Jan 2013 3133 d Likely Settlement
6:11-cv-00492 Network-1 Technologies, Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc. Plaintiff E.D. Tex. 15 Sep 2011 2321 d Likely Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Network-1 Technologies, Inc. in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Network-1 Technologies is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.