Open Text, Inc. Patent litigation record

Company 25 cases

25 cases on record naming Open Text, Inc.: 12 as claimant, 13 as respondent. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Profile this company in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

25 cases on record

Cases on record
25
As claimant
12
As respondent
13
Patents held
Not recorded
Core tech
G06F16/178 · G06F11/14 · G06F16/18 · G06F13/00 · G06F17/30 · G06F7/02 · G06F7/06 · G06F12/00 · G06F15/16 · G06Q10/00 · H04L29/06 · H04L29/08 · G06K9/68 · G06V30/10 · G06Q30/02
Case no.PartiesRoleCourtFiledDurationOutcome
7:26-cv-00156 Congruent Media Resourcing LLC v. Open Text, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 17 Apr 2026 115 d Dismissed with Prejudice
1:26-cv-00866 Adaptive Classification Technologies LLC v. Open Text, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 7 Apr 2026 37 d Voluntary dismissal
2:25-cv-00521 Monument Peak Ventures, LLC v. Open Text, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 12 May 2025 189 d Dismissed with Prejudice
4:25-cv-00230 Wapp Tech Limited Partnership v. Open Text, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 6 Mar 2025 567 d Case Transferred
2:23-cv-00533 CommWorks Solutions, LLC v. Open Text, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 20 Nov 2023 217 d Voluntary dismissal
2:23-cv-00459 Trend Micro, Inc. v. Open Text, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 2 Oct 2023 142 d Dismissed with Prejudice
1:22-cv-01063 Trend Micro, Inc. v. Open Text, Inc. Defendant E.D. Va. 16 Sep 2022 404 d Dismissed without Prejudice
2:21-cv-09191 Open Text Corporation v. Alfresco Software, Ltd. Plaintiff C.D. Cal. 23 Nov 2021 79 d Other
2:21-cv-09099 Open Text Corporation v. Hyland UK Operations Limited Plaintiff C.D. Cal. 19 Nov 2021 83 d Other
2:21-cv-09101 Open Text Corporation v. Hyland UK Operations Limited Plaintiff C.D. Cal. 19 Nov 2021 83 d Other
6:21-cv-00050 BCS Software, LLC v. Open Text, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 19 Jan 2021 385 d Likely Settlement
8:20-cv-02123 Open Text Corporation v. Hyland Software, Inc. Plaintiff C.D. Cal. 3 Nov 2020 464 d Other
8:20-cv-02116 Open Text, Inc. v. Hyland Software, Inc. Plaintiff C.D. Cal. 2 Nov 2020 793 d Consent Judgment
6:20-cv-01000 Paradise IP, LLC v. Open Text, Inc. Defendant W.D. Tex. 28 Oct 2020 188 d Voluntary dismissal
6:20-cv-00941 Open Text Corporation v. Alfresco Software, Ltd. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 9 Oct 2020 406 d Case Transferred
6:20-cv-00928 Open Text Corporation v. Alfresco Software, Ltd. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 7 Oct 2020 408 d Case Transferred
6:20-cv-00920 Open Text Corporation v. Alfresco Software, Ltd. Plaintiff W.D. Tex. 5 Oct 2020 410 d Case Transferred
1:19-cv-00394 RealTime Data, LLC v. Open Text, Inc. Defendant D. Del. 26 Feb 2019 909 d Voluntary dismissal
2:19-cv-00008 UnoWeb Virtual, LLC v. Open Text, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 10 Jan 2019 278 d Voluntary dismissal
2:17-cv-00210 Aurelian IP Management, LLC v. Open Text, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 17 Mar 2017 62 d Likely Settlement
2015-2052 Open Text, S.A. v. Box, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 22 Sep 2015 195 d Closed
2015-1978 Open Text, S.A. v. Box, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 4 Sep 2015 213 d Closed
2:15-cv-00839 Fellowship Filtering Technologies, LLC v. Open Text, Inc. Defendant E.D. Tex. 25 May 2015 86 d Voluntary dismissal
2015-1392 Open Text, S.A. v. Box, Inc. Plaintiff Fed. Cir. 27 Feb 2015 402 d Closed
3:13-cv-04910 Open Text, S.A. v. Box, Inc. Plaintiff N.D. Cal. 24 Oct 2013 477 d Likely Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases naming Open Text, Inc. in the current snapshot. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

See what Open Text is protecting

Portfolio, claim scope and where its coverage is thin. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Analyse this portfolio
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.